Everyone thinks Robinhood just listed Bittensor.
Look one layer down.
$TAO is not on the Robinhood brokerage app. You cannot tap Buy and get TAO. 27 million users did not suddenly become holders.
What went live is Robinhood Chain, their L2. A different product entirely.
ForeverMoney bridged native TAO onto that chain 1:1 through Chainlink CCIP, then seeded a pool.
300k TAO.
Now you can hold, swap, and LP TAO from an EVM wallet there.
But the network itself did not move. Emissions, staking, and subnet influence still live on Subtensor.
This is a new distribution rail, not a listing and not adoption.
It is a door. Whether anyone walks through it is the only question that matters now.
Chutes from $TAO has been moving crazy lately
the #1 ranked subnet is now sitting around a $94M market cap after a clean multi-day run
its building serverless compute for AI at scale, and the market is clearly starting to pay attention
one of the strongest subnet charts i've seen in a while
BREAKING NEWS:
$FET Kini Resmi Tersedia di Robinhood Spot
$FET atau: Artificial Superintelligence Alliance kini telah live di pasar spot: @RobinhoodApp membuka akses bagi jutaan pengguna ritel untuk membeli dan menjual token ini secara langsung.
Apakah ini akan menjadi awal kenaikan dari $FET ?
this may be the most free 5x or more over the next 12 months.
$TAO at current levels is a no brainer.
sub $200 is insane.
should be a $1000+ coin at a MINIMUM.
will repost this once she's sitting pretty above 1k.
i've been holding for many months, and adding more.
run it
My $SOL Strategy is Simple: Bought $SOL Between $60–$40.
Selling The First Bag At $500 And The Second At $1,000.
Sometimes the biggest gains come from simply holding.
@solana
NFA & DYOR
Yuma just launched the Total Market Fund.
One allocation.
Full Bittensor exposure.
$TAO + subnet alpha tokens.
AI investing is no longer just Nvidia, OpenAI, Anthropic, or venture.
There is now another layer forming.
Decentralized AI infrastructure.
Decentralized AI applications.
128 subnets.
$900M+ in subnet asset value.
Compute.
Data.
Fraud detection.
Drug discovery.
Video analysis.
Inference.
Agents.
All inside Bittensor.
Yuma is making that market easier to access.
No validators.
No wallets.
No subnet picking.
No token management.
Just institutional exposure to the full $TAO economy.
This is how a new asset class starts becoming investable, folks
$TAO
Chart credit thanks to @GSchvey for the breakdown.
Today we’re introducing the Yuma Total Market Fund. One allocation to access $TAO and the full Bittensor subnet ecosystem.
AI exposure is expanding beyond public equities and venture.
BITTENSOR RALLIES ON AI POLICY SHIFT
Bittensor $TAO jumped 17% as the U.S. moves to suspend foreign access to Anthropic’s Fable 5 and Mythos 5.
Investors see the restrictions as a boost for decentralized AI networks like Bittensor, which aren’t dependent on a single company or government approval.
🚨 BOOOOOOOOOOM 🚨
SWIFT confirms crypto rails are coming to global banking.
Over 50 major banks, including Bank of America, JP Morgan, Deutsche Bank, Bank of China, and SBI, are backing the initiative for cross-border payments.
SWIFT handles over $150 trillion annually. $XRP
Safello's TAO ETP (STAO) is now listed on Euronext Paris — making euro-denominated trading available for the first time. 🇫🇷
The Safello-branded product issued by DDA ETP AG is 100% physically backed by staked TAO, and is now available across three major European exchanges:
🇨🇭 SIX Swiss Exchange (USD)
🇸🇪 Nasdaq Stockholm (SEK)
🇫🇷 Euronext Paris (EUR)
Full press release below 👇
The AI narrative is knocking. Waiting for it with open arms? 👀
$TAO is still on fire despite the drop below the neckline of the inverse H&S pattern.
That move below the neckline looks more like a buy opportunity than a breakdown. The FVG has now been filled.
📍 Entry: $255–$280
🛑 SL: $250
🎯 TP1: $350
🎯 TP2: $477
🎯 TP3: $540
#TAOUSDT #BITTENSOR
I've been in #bittensor ecosystem since the early days. I've watched this network grow from a fringe idea to something @chamath talks about publicly.
I need to say something, not as a commentator but as a early subnet co-founder and as someone with skin in the game.
This is not the crisis it looks like. This is Governance Debt - the compounding friction that accumulates when a protocol's social layer fails to keep pace with its technical genius. #Bitcoin went through the block size wars. #Ethereum went through the DAO wars. Both emerged more legitimate, more anti-fragile, and ultimately more valuable. Not despite the conflict - because of how the community responded to it.
The question isn't who is right. The question is whether the $TAO community has the maturity to convert this moment into structural progress.
I believe it does. But only if we're honest about what this dispute actually revealed.
To @const_reborn: You built something genuinely rare. The #dTAO architecture is elegant — using alpha token markets to allocate emissions through price signals rather than committee decisions is one of the most honest incentive designs in crypto. Stepping down from the Opentensor CEO role was a rare act of intellectual honesty that most founders never show. I genuinely respect it.
But the community asks for one more step. Not because you're wrong on the technical facts of this specific dispute. But because the gap between technical correctness and community trust has become a liability for the protocol itself. When your alpha token sells - however small relative to your holdings - read as governance actions, that is a structural problem, not a perception problem.
Champion a neutral audit layer. It costs you nothing and gains the protocol everything.
To @DistStateAndMe: What your team proved with Covenant-72B cannot be unproved. A 72B parameter model trained permissionlessly across dozens of contributors on commodity hardware - cited by #Anthropic's co-founder, noticed by @chamath. That proof lives in the research, not in any one network's infrastructure. Build wherever you build next. But don't let the exit become the headline that overwrites the evidence.
The temperatures are high because the stakes are genuinely historic. Grayscale has filed for $TAO spot ETF. Serious institutional capital is now watching this ecosystem with real intent. The worst possible thing we can do at this exact moment is look like every other #Web3 project that imploded over informal power disputes.
Now here is what I actually want to say because this moment is too important to spend entirely on the flame war.
The dispute exposed #Bittensor's most critical missing layer: there is no neutral, on-chain mechanism for subnet evaluation, governance arbitration or accountability.
Subnet quality is vibes-based. Emissions integrity is vibes-based. Miner collusion detection is vibes-based. When conflicts arise, they resolve on #Twitter - not through transparent, verifiable process. That is not a criticism of any individual. It is a design gap that this community can fill, permissionlessly, without asking anyone's approval.
Specifically:
① A Neutral 'Moody's for Subnets' - an independent Research Validator Node producing academic-grade subnet audits. If a subnet is on 100% burn code and not running, the data makes that case. Not a founder's alpha sell. Not a Discord moderator action. The data!
This also solves the cold start problem and enables a base model for weights initialization.
② Proof-of-Intelligence as Protocol Standard (PoIP) - mandating Chain-of-Thought traces that validators can mathematically verify, combined with ZK Proof-of-Compute. If we cannot verify the reasoning, we should not reward the work. This transforms #Bittensor from a market of claims into a market of verifiable intelligence. That is what Jensen #nvidia is actually betting on.
③ Shapley Value Rewards: restructuring miner compensation around unique contribution to consensus, not consensus-matching. This kills collusion incentives at the protocol level. Structurally. No moderator required.
④ Cross-Subnet Schemas - Bittensor's ERC moment - #Ethereum's equivalent of ERC. 128 isolated subnets is a fragmented network. 128 subnets on shared interoperability standards is a composable intelligence economy. The difference is enormous and buildable right now.
None of these require a multisig. None require the Opentensor Foundation. None require Const's approval or Sam's blessing. They require builders who understand the protocol deeply enough to ship them - and a community that demands them loudly enough to make them unavoidable.
The $TAO community has been celebrating but we have been too passive on governance. We outsourced the decisions about what this network becomes to a very small number of people and then expressed surprise when informal power concentrated exactly where formal power was absent.
Revolutionary technology demands unprecedented governance. We cannot import Web2 power structures onto #Web3 rails, call it decentralization and then act shocked when the gap shows.
Build the Bittensor Protocol Infrastructure & Research Lab - a permissionless, replicable innovation hub. I am proposing an International AGI Reasoning Competition targeting the top 0.1% of global reasoning architects, beginning in emerging economies that this network was always supposed to serve.
I am working on the synthetic dataset archive that captures miner reasoning as a commercial asset and turns it into a Process Reward Model - making AI safe by design, not by policy.
The goal is a self-sustaining model accountable to no single person. Governed by the community. Funded by validator revenue & dataset licensing.
This is the Protocol Memory that will outlive all of us - and the conflict that sparked it will be a footnote.
I've been quiet for a while but not anymore.
If you're a serious builder, researcher, validator or investor who wants to work on this - my DMs are open.
Forward!
$TAO #Bittensor #DecentralizedAI
I am not going to sugarcoat this. Last night hurt $TAO & Subnet holders
The founder of Covenant AI decided to cash out of SN3, SN39, and SN81, dumped roughly 37,000 $TAO worth of subnet Alpha on the way out, and cratered prices across the board. $TAO dropped as much as 27%. Nearly $900 million in market cap wiped. $9 million in longs liquidated. Alpha holders on those subnets got absolutely crushed.
I was one of them. I lost a significant amount from this. That is the reality and I am not going to pretend otherwise.
But I am still here. And I am still buying. Let me tell you why.
First, let me be clear about what actually happened. A subnet owner got into a disagreement with Const, got upset, and used it as an excuse to dump his bags on the people who trusted him. That is it. That is the whole story. He dressed it up as a principled stand against centralized governance but the man sold 37,000 $TAO worth of Alpha on his own community while posting a manifesto. That is a rug plain and simple.
Const responded within the hour. Publicly. On chain. With a solution.
Some people are acting like Bittensor died last night. It did not. Let me show you what actually happened in the hours after the dump.
Const proposed lock-based subnet ownership where ownership of a subnet is determined by a team's long-term economic commitment to the project. Not by who registered first. Not by who controls the keys. By who has skin in the game over time. Investors would see in advance if an owner unlocked their tokens. The market could reprice the subnet before the owner dumps. And conviction could be directed to another team or even an agent to manage the system.
If implemented, this would be the most significant governance upgrade since dTAO launched. And it came within hours. Not weeks. Not after a committee meeting. Within hours.
That is what this network does. It finds its weak spots and it fixes them. Fast.
@MacrocosmosAI posted: "Bittensor always emerges stronger from pain. Hacks, exploits, disagreements all fade into the history of this protocol. The flame of distributed training continues to burn brightly. One individual does not make a nation."
@jon_durbin from Chutes: "Chutes is and always will be a Bittensor project. Chutes is Bittensor and Bittensor is Chutes."
@MaxScore from Score: "Score is and always will be a Bittensor project. Score is Bittensor and Bittensor is Score."
Loayei: "Don't care about the drama. Will continue building $TAO."
@TroyQuasar from Quasar called it what it was. He said it was bullshit, that no one is bigger than the network, and that Quasar will take it from here.
The builders did not leave. The builders doubled down within hours. Publicly. On record.
@markjeffrey put it simply: "Bittensor is quite a LOT more than Subnet 3, and $TAO will carry on fine without it. There are 125 other subnets plus three new slots that just freed up."
Three new subnet slots just opened. While people were panic selling, builders were already eyeing the open seats.
@SiamKidd gave the most grounded take. He acknowledged the drama, acknowledged that Sam's governance concerns were not entirely wrong, but made the point that Const's motives have always been genuine. This is growth. This is what permissionless systems look like when they encounter stress. They break in specific places, they get patched, and they come back harder.
This is not the first time something like this has happened on Bittensor. It is not even the second time. Nous Research left the ecosystem before. And what happened? The network adapted, subnets evolved, and the protocol kept building. Every previous inflection point led to upgrades that made the system stronger.
Covenant-72B was real. The training was real.
Fundamentals haven’t changed:
21M hard cap, halving complete, 68% staked, nine institutional products accumulating, Grayscale ETF pending.
$TAO just went on sale at a 27% discount.
Builders keep building.
I’m buying this dip.
$TAO
The Guy Who Made Millions From Uber Says This $300 Coin Could Hit $32,000
Jason Calacanis Predicts 200x for $TAO: Here's What You Need to Know
Early Uber investor Jason Calacanis just made a bold call on #TAO during his "This Week In Startups" podcast.
He believes TAO could deliver a 200x return over the next 5-10 years, targeting a $500 billion market cap.
He called it the "better Bitcoin" and compared its potential to Ethereum and Solana.
But here's what most people are Missing:
➤ Calacanis is NOT a neutral observer. He has invested ~$500K in TAO personally and is a consulting partner at Stillcore Capital, a fund built specifically around Bittensor.
➤ This is a classic "talking his own book" situation.
What makes TAO interesting regardless:
➤ Fixed supply of 21M tokens (same as Bitcoin)
➤ First halving completed in Dec 2024
➤ Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently endorsed the decentralized AI model
➤ Currently trading around ~$300 with ~$3B market cap
➤ Ranked #32 on CoinGecko
What CryptoPatel community already did:
➤ We shared #TAOUSDT spot entry setup with chart around $150-$160
➤ Already delivered 160%+ profit from our entry
➤ Our community was positioned well before mainstream attention
A 200x from here means $500B market cap. For context, that's roughly where Ethereum sits today.
Possible? Yes. Guaranteed? Absolutely not.
Always check who benefits from a prediction before you act on it.
TA Only. Not Financial Advice. ALWAYS DYOR.