His claim that “although Christ’s atoning death is sufficient…its actualization requires...” is a contradiction. For sufficiency requires nothing.
He should’ve said: “although the atoning death is necessary; it’s not sufficient.” But making it necessary contradicts his other
@DanBurmawy What are you trying to pull off?
The NT says:
Those who deny Jesus is the Messiah are antichrist.
Because they deny the son, so they don't have the Father.
Those who hate Jesus, hate the Father.
I don’t know who are more stupid: (a) the people who somehow deluded themselves that a preternatural level of habitual bullshitting could be an acceptable defect in a president or (b) the people who even now somehow don’t realize that most of what he says is bullshit.
Barry Goldwater telling the truth back in 1988 that Israel controls our politicians and our government.
And it’s far worse today!
But tell me again how Russia and China control our elections.
@NuriSunnah They did but Q was backed up in writing pretty early on, so it was harder to manipulate. Still, there were probably some attempts to reinterpret the rasm, reinterpret the meaning, omit or add words & verses, etc. 'Uthman is said to have burned other copies of Q so we can't know
This is delusional as saying that Plato or Aristotle were Christians.
A Levantine is closer to the Ancient Greeks than any German, Scandinavian, French, or even Serbian or Bulgarian person. (Sometimes closer even than some modern day Greeks).
They are genetically closer to Southern Italians than anyone in Lebanon. Just because they have olive skin, that doesn't make them middle eastern.
They share the majority of their genealogy with Europeans, this makes them European.
White is the social category for people of European descent, so they are definetly white..🤣
It's a hilarious that groups like Celts, Germanics, Norse & Britons who were branded as barbarians & often enslaved by the Greco-Romans are now portraying themselves as Greek beauties, warriors & rulers!
Their post renaissance edge fuelled this appropriation of classical ideals!
@88firebolts However, the divine cannot be said to have started to act to create (since that would imply it being in time). Rather, it does so eternally. Thus, temporal beings are created one after another without a beginning in time (the big bang is not a temporal event but the cause of it).
@88firebolts This is compound ignorance. Being static is an attribute of movable objects not being in actually in motion. Divine beings, for Aristotle, cannot be said to be moving or static.
the ancient greeks had far more interactions with africa than with germanic barbarians from the north. in the first book of the iliad the gods are not on olympus but feasting with the ethiopians, the only mortals they consider worthy of their company
Fred M. Donner notes that the Constitution of Medina recognized Jews as being part of the Ummah(!) At this early stage of the religion a Jew (or Christian) could be recognized as a Believer (Mu'min)
Sunni exclusivism appears to arise after the Umayyad Caliph, 'Abd al-Malik (LA)
@EdlerWanderer@JawharDawood موقفي باختصار ان قوله وان كان يلزمه شناعة لكن كذلك قول البعض ان في القران ما يفوض ولا يعلم معناه (او يعلم معناه قطعا) الا الله. فلازمه انه قد اوحي عبثا. مع ذلك يعذرون لانه ليس في الاصول.
@EdlerWanderer@JawharDawood لم انتبه لقوله ذلك. وانا اخالفه هنا لكن اعتبره كعامة المسلمين الذين يقولون ان من التأويل ما لا يمكن الجزم به الى قيام الساعة. خصوصا ان الدكتور يعتقد ان المختلف فيه هو من هذا الباب. اي مما حاله حال الفروع.
@EdlerWanderer@JawharDawood لم انتبه لقوله ذلك. وانا اخالفه هنا لكن اعتبره كعامة المسلمين الذين يقولون ان من التأويل ما لا يمكن الجزم به الى قيام الساعة. خصوصا ان الدكتور يعتقد ان المختلف فيه هو من هذا الباب. اي مما حاله حال الفروع.
@EdlerWanderer@JawharDawood فالجزم بالقراءة الصحيحة ممكن وان احتاج ذلك الى نظر ودراسة. مع العلم ان المختلف فيه من القراءات هو من باب المختلف فيه من التأويل. اي اي هو امر اجتهادي لا يعيق نجاة المسلم جهله او عدم الجزم به.
@EdlerWanderer@JawharDawood اتوقع انه يقصد انه بالامكان استنباط القراءة الصحيحة بالعقل كما يستنبط اولو العلم التأويل الصحيح. فالقراءة الصحيحة مبثوثة بين المسلمين كما ان التأويل الصحيح مبثوث بينهم.
فأنت تصر على ان القراءة الصحيحة اما ان تكون محصورة في مصحف واحد بالفعل، او انه لا يمكن حصرها. وهو لا يسلم ذلك.