Eph’phatha

Tolle Legge

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

@sincead33 Painful

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

@ReelPressence @frankmcasanova @JesusandWhatnot Wut?

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

@ReelPressence @frankmcasanova @JesusandWhatnot I gave you examples
There are tonnes of moralists you can look at on dress. Prummer, bouvier, etc

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

@ReelPressence @frankmcasanova @JesusandWhatnot ...Idk if youre realising that youre saying that every single exegete and moral theologian ever is wrong but you have basically outed yourself as having a completely valueless opinion by the metrics of theology as a science

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

@ReelPressence @frankmcasanova @JesusandWhatnot That isn't how it works. The gravity of the good has to be sufficient to outweight the gravity of the foreseen risk. You apply double effect like this to doctors treating female patients when theres no other choice - not to sunbathing. Check prummer or henry davis etc.

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

@ReelPressence @EvensongEnjoyer @JesusandWhatnot Not only should people not go to beaches dressed like that; a just society ought to beat it out of them.

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

@ReelPressence @JesusandWhatnot These materials are sufficiently clear

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

@wagnerrmfc @JesusandWhatnot Again: read Vi supremi apostolatus (1930), Quaesto vivace spettacolo (1940), Viva gioia e per noi (1941), Davanti a quaesta magnifica (1941) Di gran cuore (1957) for the fullest authoritative treatments. You should see also S jn 23 refer back to these in il templo massimo (1962).

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

@thomaesplendor Lonergan by himself could do it

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

@BenObeseJecty Does the english race matter? I dont believe you are able to answer honestly without alienating most english people.

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

@Dr_zato317 @ChildOfStThomas By this logic, a brothel is modest.

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

@wagnerrmfc @JesusandWhatnot It would also be useful to review the approbation of the work of Fr Kunkel, by Pius xii, and the original text issued on his behalf on sep 28 1928 by Cdl Vicar Pompilii in the Roman Clerical Bulletin, which the later documents refer back to, here:
https://t.co/9Bzns8Q8wh

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

@wagnerrmfc @JesusandWhatnot Again: read Vi supremi apostolatus (1930), Quaesto vivace spettacolo (1940), Viva gioia e per noi (1941), Davanti a quaesta magnifica (1941) Di gran cuore (1957) for the fullest authoritative treatments. You should see also S jn 23 refer back to these in il templo massimo (1962).

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

@ReelPressence @JesusandWhatnot Do you know what canon law says about our duties towards teachings that are neither defined ex cathedra nor by a conciliar definition?

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

@TransedentP @JesusandWhatnot @TDisputations Ive cited 1 cor 12 (and for the first principle regarding the subjective element regarding what is ideal, 1 cor 11), but the other loci are generally taken from isaiah 47 and other places
If you look in any catholic moral theology systematics youll find this easily in more detail

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

@videonMode @Yotler1 Not even veiled lol

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

@AstolfoH83306 @Yotler1 They were the same colour chud.

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

@Yotler1 It's also a horrific indignity to the wife.

[JuventutemDC @juventutemDC]

'When young people are drawn to Gregorian chant, silence, incense, kneeling, ad orientem celebration, and classical spirituality, do not immediately ask: "What has gone wrong here?" Ask instead: "What are they seeking here that they cannot find elsewhere?"'
— Bishop Rob Mutsaerts

[Eph’phatha @beati_mites]

This is my own perspective as a british asian - I'm only british in the improper sense of owing something to this land and its people, and having an influence from it by being raised here, enjoying the fruits of its common goods. There is a deeper and truer sense in which Im not.

[Suella Braverman @SuellaBraverman]

As I’ve said before, I’m not English.

I’m proud to be British. My family and ancestors have a link to Britain which spans centuries.

But in no way are we English. Yes, I was born in England, speak English and support the England football team. And indeed, I love England and the English people.

But to say I’m English is to take a ‘laissez-faire, anything-goes’ attitude to ethnicity, citizenship and identity. It also denies me my Asian heritage. The liberals (many of them in today’s Conservative Party) take this cosmopolitan approach to Englishness. They’re terrified of being called racist so they say that anyone, as long as they’re born here, can be English.

I take the conservative approach. Englishness is an ethnicity. There have been English people for centuries and we need to recognise this more if we are to start taking a more muscular approach to citizenship and nationality. And no, it’s not racist to say this.

Other countries have no qualms in limiting who can be part of their citizenry and use ethnicity and culture as criteria. Here, the dogma of multiculturalism has been so corrosive that some people don’t actually know who we are anymore.