blank yao

Engineering Scientist

[DHH @dhh]

Omacom Foundation has raised another $2 million from @xdanger and @brian_armstrong for now a combined TWELVE MILLION DOLLARS from our Founding Patrons. I'm incredibly grateful for this continued flow of support. WE WILL FIX EVERYTHING! 🙏 https://t.co/BFqktWWhVQ

[stdrc @istdrc]

被 Slack 删除 workspace 的中国公司可以试试 Slock，我们正在定义的下一代生产力协作平台，还在疯狂迭代打磨，不过已经初具可用性～

[Boris Cherny @bcherny]

Mistakes happen. As a team, the important thing is to recognize it’s never an individuals’s fault — it’s the process, the culture, or the infra.

In this case, there was a manual deploy step that should have been better automated. Our team has made a few improvements to the automation for next time, a couple more on the way.

[blank yao @blankyao]

编程珠玑番外篇

[Eric Xu (e/Mettā) @xleaps]

感谢 @yihong0618 的敦促, 把创业经历那篇文章贴上了博客.

新 follow 我的推友: 博客上或许有些其他你感兴趣的其他内容

https://t.co/YAf1XdZZD7

[Gergely Orosz @GergelyOrosz]

Sage observation from @karrisaarinen (CEO of Linear)

It now makes SO MUCH sense why I see a bunch of eng teams rebuilt a SaaS vendor in-house with AI, brag about and feel good

They are doing side quests... and they don't even know it. And they are not helping their co win!!

[blank yao @blankyao]

从博客时代就很认真的读博主写的文章，当时还很诧异从 Google 到 Fitbit 再到 Reddit 的职业经历，原来有这么波澜起伏的故事

[Eric Xu (e/Mettā) @xleaps]

https://t.co/inXqWdQSNy

[Alex Kotliarskyi 🇺🇦 @alex_frantic]

My thoughts on gas town and software factories:

https://t.co/Al8xdzJXuU

[Kevin Kwok @kevinakwok]

OpenAI people:

I asked our Chief Research Officer why we keep losing VPs of Research and he said whenever one leaves he just promotes one of our best IC researchers to replace them so I said it sounds like we’re just feeding our best ICs into the VP grinder and then the HRBP gave me a very stern look.

[Frank Wang 玉伯 @lifesinger]

阿里高层里，最不缺的就是有认知的人，最缺的是愿意默默付出和实践的人。

AI 时代，借助 AI 和职位，每个高管都可以高屋建瓴，都会画图纸。可有啥用呢。

AI 时代，认知不是关键。尊重常识，有行动和实现的能力，才是成事的关键。

Qwen 的变动，大抵有上面的原因。会画图纸的人，在大厂，很容易干掉默默付出的能实现的人。

我三年前离开蚂蚁集团，有半数原因，也是因为这个。

想想好久远，如同十年前了。还是出���创业好。

[blank yao @blankyao]

用 Claude Code 给 Claude Code 写 skills 的体验更奇妙了

[宝玉 @dotey]

Claude Code 迭代很快，已经到了 2.1.1 版本，这次有一堆更新，三个值得关注的更新：
1）技能热重载终于来了。改完 skills 文件夹里的��西立刻生效，不用重启 session

2）新增 context: fork 选项，技能和斜杠命令可以在独立子智能体里跑，不污染主对话上下文。那些需要大量中间步骤但你不想看全过程的任务，现在干净多了

3）子智能体（Task 工具）被拒绝权限后不再直接躺平，会自己尝试其他方案继续干活。这让 agentic 工作流更有韧性，不会因为一个权限卡住整个流程

[Jediah Katz @jediahkatz]

I wanted to share more on our context engineering work in Cursor and how we're adapting to the improved capabilities of agent models.

We've transitioned from a paradigm of static context (prompt stuffing, tons of tools in system prompt) to a new world where agents are much better at searching for information and maintaining consistency over long sessions — allowing us to take fuller advantage of dynamic context.

[Eric Xu (e/Mettā) @xleaps]

2026 年应该是AI coding 本地化，规模化的一年 因为模型上的细微��异固然重要 ，更大的需求来自团队，而团队现在有足够的空间来定制 harness.

的确，如果是个人继续项目 用 Claude Code 就可以了。如果是团队，肯定会将团队的工作流，知识，包括工具定制化，将协作固定化。CC 不开源，在可定制上仅提供 Anthropic 自己想出来的一套配置方案，在生态系统竞争里很难长久保持优势。

一个类似但不恰当的比喻是 git 底层一开始真的只是一个不可变文件系统。因为是开源的项目，squash/stash/worktree 等更高级的工作流都是社区后来加入的，而且都需要往上游贡献 想象一下除了拥有 Gemini Claude codex 三家以外 许多非 AI 大厂会选择基于什么系统定制 结果就不言而喻了。

[blank yao @blankyao]

Just made a Chinese version https://t.co/6pYCOAXZhH

[Frank Wang 玉伯 @lifesinger]

成长最重要的，不是学习。而是拥有为什么而学的那个一。

比如对我来说，曾经有段时间成长最快的，是因为做语雀。最近一年成长很快的原因，是因为创业做 YouMind。

一旦你拥有这个一，无论看什么，无论是信息找你，还是你找信息，一切就都会围绕这个一去思考。

比如最近研究 Lovable 的定价，比如最近很着迷 Costco 的商业模式，或者随意看罗永浩采访大鹏的视频播客，都会满脑子回归到：对做 YouMind 有什么启发，然后发现还真挺有启发的，就特别高兴。能在深度思考后，真的在 YouMind 上做实验，特别有意思。有种万物注我之感。

一旦有一个一，人就很幸福。

[immusoul @ayuan1000]

#晨读 贵刊（及其附属刊物《少年新知》）2025年光靠卖纸质版就创造了超过一个亿的营收，同事们真的太给力了！正是因为发行团队的努力，才能让采编团队在基本不受商业影响的情况下专注于创造优质内容，这是一个正反馈的案例，我就是这个案例的获益者之一。https://t.co/CvmcKKlSEq

[宝玉 @dotey]

如果你看过半年前 DHH（Ruby on Rails 的创造者）和 Lex Fridman 的访谈，聊了整整六个小时，他说自己虽然喜欢用 AI 当助手，查 API、找灵感，但坚决不让 AI 直接往他的代码库里写东西。

他的原话大意是：如果你的手指不沾代码，你就会跟代码失去联系。就像弹吉他一样，Spotify 上有完美的录音，但自己弹的��趣是不一样的。“我的乐趣就是自己敲代码。”

当时在访谈里他还警告年轻程序员：如果一个东西谁都能 vibe coding 出来，那就不是什么值钱的技能。你只是在点“接受”的“tap monkey🐒”。

现在他发推说：别让 AI 的垃圾和尴尬，否定它的神奇。这是我们让电脑做过的最激动人心的事，仅次于把它们连上互联网。

他现在承认，当时一半的抵触其实是因为模型不够好。那时候花在改写 AI 代码上的时间，比自己从头写还多。

但现在情况反过来了。模型能力到了，工具体验也到了。他最近在用的 opencode 让 AI Agent 能跑 bash、访问网页、用 LSP 做代码分析。看模型搞定一个复杂的 bug，他说是 revelation（启示）。

DHH 代表一类人��资深程序员，对代码有洁癖，写了三十年代码还觉得写代码有乐趣的人。这类很多人是抵触 AI 写代码的，但现在越来越多的人开始转变观念拥抱 AI。

DHH 在推文中说他现在还是会手写很多代码但会让 AI 写初稿：
> 这既是出于必要（有时候模型还是给不出我想要的效果），也是出于乐趣（写代码本身多好玩啊！）。
> 但我已经完全接受了一个现实：先让 AI 搞个像样的初稿，确实能让工作效率大大提升。

DHH 在 Lex 那期 6 小时的播客里说过一句话：
> 我们对未来的预测往往是错的，但这不妨碍我们做选择。

他的选择是：继续写代码，因为喜欢；同时拥抱 AI，因为它确实有用。

“What a time to love computers!”
确实是个爱电脑的好时候。

[Mitchell Hashimoto @mitchellh]

Slop drives me crazy and it feels like 95+% of bug reports, but man, AI code analysis is getting really good. There are users out there reporting bugs that don't know ANYTHING about our stack, but are great AI drivers and producing some high quality issue reports.

This person (linked below) was experiencing Ghostty crashes and took it upon themselves to use AI to write a python script that can decode our crash files, match them up with our dsym files, and analyze the codebase for attempting to find the root cause, and extracted that into an Agent Skill.

They then came into Discord, warned us they don't know Zig at all, don't know macOS dev at all, don't know terminals at all, and that they used AI, but that they thought critically about the issues and believed they were real and asked if we'd accept them. I took a look at one, was impressed, and said send them all.

This fixed 4 real crashing cases that I was able to manually verify and write a fix for from someone who -- on paper -- had no fucking clue what they were talking about. And yet, they drove an AI with expert skill.

I want to call out that in addition to driving AI with expert skill, they navigated the terrain with expert skill as well. They didn't just toss slop up on our repo. They came to Discord as a human, reached out as a human, and talked to other humans about what they've done. They were careful and thoughtful about the process.

People like this give me hope for what is possible. But it really, really depends on high quality people like this. Most today -- to continue the analogy -- are unfortunately driving like a teenager who has only driven toy go-karts.

Examples: https://t.co/n8xCcPYSjw

[Beyang @beyang]

This is such a good example of how the mindset of the wielder can have a huge effect on the impact of new technology. Saving time need not result in laziness and boredom. Quite the contrary, embracing it can open up new worlds of possibility, quality, and craftsmanship.

[Boris Cherny @bcherny]

I'm Boris and I created Claude Code. Lots of people have asked how I use Claude Code, so I wanted to show off my setup a bit.

My setup might be surprisingly vanilla! Claude Code works great out of the box, so I personally don't customize it much. There is no one correct way to use Claude Code: we intentionally build it in a way that you can use it, customize it, and hack it however you like. Each person on the Claude Code team uses it very differently.

So, here goes.

[blank yao @blankyao]

@robbinfan 这个头像太怀旧了