sometimes your friend will spam you on reels w straight coal but you still like it because his girl left him and he’s buns at the game so he lowkey needs it right now
Anthropic has better data than OpenAI.
This is the secret sauce that is being cooked into Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5
Codex training data is built on a billion novice users.
Claude training data is built by millions of cracked engineers.
Fable 5.5 and Haiku 5.5 will continue to show this phenomenon.
Sol 6.2 and Astra 6.1 will as well.
I am very uncomfortable about people trying to ascribe religious force or a surrender of human judgment to AI models, and think it is a real safety issue.
@cecemerollingg@hugeloadmac@EnsouledVirgin@katscode it’s not ridiculous to say that you’d probably have a deeper experience w ur date spending $60 going to topgolf or go kart racing or some form of an interactive date, compared to $60 for some shitty sushi rolls
@ccccchrissssss@deteccphilippe@vkxvxk reason for them to be interested in that data so they can find ways to detect these devices. I’m not sure what you’re referring to by stragglers or “removing” devices, both Ferrum & MAKCU are passthrough. There is utility in storing peripheral data over time to detect aimbot. 2/2
@ccccchrissssss@deteccphilippe@vkxvxk You’re making a few different overlapping claims.
A significant portion of cheaters roaming for hundreds of games are using Ferrum/MAKCU devices for aim. Every cheater using DMA or 2pc AI/color relies on those input devices to use any aim features. Hence, there’s a clear 1/2
@ccccchrissssss@deteccphilippe@vkxvxk “typing all sophisticated like philip won’t make you any smarter”
I don’t see what I said that could’ve given that impression, but regardless of everything else you wrote, my point still stands. How exactly do you expect to detect fake input devices without checking peripherals?