Frankly, I don’t see how President Zelensky can still dismiss Fedorov after these protests and appoint Ihor Klymenko to solve Ukraine’s mobilization problem.
Ukraine’s mobilization crisis is not fundamentally a manpower problem. It is a trust problem.
No democratic country can mobilize effectively without a functioning social contract between the state and society. People will make extraordinary sacrifices only if they trust the institutions asking them to do so.
Fedorov was one of the few officials giving people hope that this social contract could be rebuilt. His battlefield assessment raised difficult but necessary questions about what wasn’t working and how to fix it.
If, after all these protests and everything revealed by that assessment, the response is simply to replace him with someone the public does not trust, mobilization will not improve. It will become even harder.
Trust cannot be imposed. It has to be earned.
I still hope it is not too late for this crisis to end with wiser decisions rather than deeper divisions.
🔞🕯️ A Russian missile killed an entire family. Will this photo stop the war? Most likely not. But I believe that the world should see the truth, - photographer Yefrem Lukatsky
"I hope that those who will be hurt by this photo will forgive me. Kyiv, July 6, 2026," - he added.
@laurimyllyvirta That's exactly right. There's an important lesson in all this. We can blockade a major oil producer like Iran and prices don't go through the roof. Europe should apply that lesson to Russia and shut down the shadow fleet in the Baltic as soon as possible...
Grauenvoll, das sollte jedem zu denken geben, der leichtfertig Gebietsabtretungen fordert. Das bedeutet für die Menschen in von Russland besetzten Gebieten: Mord, Folter, Vergewaltigung, Tod
https://t.co/xnHtehfgOS
2011 CDU
Atomausstieg bis 2022
2013 CDU
Solarausbau gebremst
2017 CDU
Windkraftausbau gebremst
2019 CDU
Kohleausstieg bis 2038
2021 CDU
Erdgasausstieg bis 2045
2005-2021 CDU
Netzausbau verpennt
2026 rechte Ideologen:
"Die Grünen haben unsere Energieversorgung ruiniert."
🤡
OpenAI has blocked 20 ChatGPT accounts tied to Russia's Telegram channel Rybar, which used AI to generate multilingual propaganda posts, Sora-generated videos, and fake comments amplifying disinformation, such as false claims of German influence in Moldova via linked outlet REST Media, according to the company.
Rybar, run by Mikhail Zvinchuk and boasting 1.3 million followers, leveraged AI for commercial services like social media management and expanded into covert operations, including a $600,000 annual plan to sway elections in Democratic Republic of Congo, Cameroon, Burundi, and Madagascar through organized protests and online campaigns.
The EU will propose a permanent ban on Russian oil on 15 April—three days after Hungary's election.
The timing is deliberate. Two EU officials confirmed it. Hungary imports 92% of its crude from Russia. The EU average: 1%.
https://t.co/TEGqGvlMtr
Die AfD–Zuflucht ehemaliger Stasi-Hauptamtlicher.
CORRECTIV zählt mind.34 Ex-Stasi-Männer in ihren Reihen.
Dieselben,die DDR-Bürger bespitzelt & eingesperrt haben, marschieren jetzt bei den 'Patrioten' mit. Und die Parteispitze?
Schweigt feige.Ekelhaft
https://t.co/urd9eh43R9
Als man beim Thema Graichen damals Habeck angepöbelt hat, hieß es "Vetternwirtschaft", "Filz" und "Versumpfung".
Wenn der AfD-Spitzenkandidat in Sachsen-Anhalt den eigenen Vater mit Top-Gehalt in der Fraktion unterbringt, geht es ums "Vertrauen". Ahja.
https://t.co/BoSaATo9vg
Leute die sich gestern im Faschismus wähnten weil sie eine Infektionsschutzmaske tragen sollten, finden es heute in Ordnung wenn in den USA von einer Art Geheimpolizei Staatsbürger erschossen werden, weil diese "sich nicht an Anweisungen gehalten haben"
The paradoxical tragedy of Europe: they understand the importance of defense only when their main ally (U.S.) threatens them, when their main adversary (Russia) did, most remained quiet — no contingency plans, no defense spending increases, nothing.
this is the simple answer to people who keep saying NATO expansion matters. Sure, it matters because it presented an obstacle to Russian imperial ambitions. Putin didn't invade because he hated NATO expansion, he hated NATO expansion because he wanted to invade.
To really understand how Russia thinks today at the negotiation table, we need to go a bit back in time. Enter Andrei Gromyko, the Soviet diplomat known as "Mr. Nyet" he wasn’t just being stubborn he had a method. He literally said about the West that it is "impatient, divided, and always pushing for quick results," and that Moscow could use this to its advantage. His repeated vetoes at the UN weren’t arbitrary they were lessons in pressure, patience, and leverage, Every concession the West offered, he pushed for more, asking relentlessly, step by step, until the other side gave more than they expected.
The idea was simple: the West wants action fast, results yesterday. Moscow doesn’t. Delay, test, observe and let your counterpart expose its divisions. Gromyko built a doctrine around exploiting Western weaknesses: if they push too hard, you stand firm; if they compromise too quickly, you extract more. He saw the West as fragmented and inconsistent, and he treated negotiations as a zero-sum game where time itself is a weapon.
Look at Europe or the U.S. today: divided on everything, arguing internally, chasing short-term optics. Moscow sees the same patterns, and the strategy hasn’t changed much. When Russia negotiates, it’s not about compromise first it’s about waiting, observing, and letting the other side make mistakes.
So, to understand Russian policies now, whether in Europe, the UN, or with global powers, remember Gromyko’s approach: patience over haste, leverage over agreement, and exploiting divisions over rushing deals. The history is old, but the method is very much alive, meanwhile we have too agree nowadays with Gromyko’s views.
Sprecht mir alle nach:
- Physik ist keine Meinung
- Mathematik ist keine Meinung
- Chemie ist keine Meinung
- Homöopathie hat nichts mit Wissenschaft zu tun.
- Wenn 99,99% unserer Wissenschaftler:innen den menschengemachten Klimawandel bestätigen, dann gibt es ihn.
Punkt.