David

[David @candlelightowl]

npub1hhczvf0seq8nwakd7n8faf85rawmvlcacsnvgf2sw8d4unulkf4qpg7gq2

[David @candlelightowl]

@peculiarchichii I thought castration was a good opening policy. Look at death row maybe.

[David @candlelightowl]

@profstonge Would this revert the nation back to effectively the articles of confederacy though?

[David @candlelightowl]

@MichaelDunwort1 @stephanlivera Not an actual addressing his point.

[Brian Atlas @BrianAtlas]

Candace Owens declined my debate invite I emailed to her back in May. Not just ignored, actually responded and declined. She is the one who said she would welcome a public debate.

[Mike Winger @MikeWingerii]

Dear Candace Owens followers,

This is your chance to cut and run.

[David @candlelightowl]

@AlpacaAurelius So it was common practice for a majority of Mongolians to include a substantive portion of fruit in their daily diet? They looked upon the tiny bush berries as part of their staple? Was it in their white food or red food in their diet?

[Quattro (Weiss's Husband) @QuattroMKII]

A statement that can only be made by the historically ignorant.

Before Christians took over the Roman Empire, it was normal for Roman parents to dispose of unwanted babies (of which were mostly daughters) by simply dumping them on trash heaps. This was a practice known as 'exposure'. If babies didn't outright die, they'd be picked up by brothel owners or slavers to be turned into products for profit.

Many Christians adopted these unwanted children as their own. Because many of these children were girls, and because the conditions they grew up in weren't very fortunate, early Christianity developed a reputation for being a religion for women and poor people.

It wouldn't be until Christian Emperors like Constantine that the practice of exposure was finally equated to murder.

So yes, Christians did invent most of what we know as "Basic Human Morality" as we know it today. You stand on the shoulders of giants but are too arrogant to look down and see where your feet are planted.

[David @candlelightowl]

@AlpacaAurelius Where did they get them and what were they on the hundreds of miles of open grassland?

[vryfokkenou @vryfokkenou]

BIP110 has consensus.

No, wait. It does not have consensus.

Actually, hang on a minute.

It has consensus, but only among the people who matter.

[David @candlelightowl]

@TFTC21 @GrassFedBitcoin Grass fed bitcoin is also a retard so I’m not surprised

[BRITISH HODL ❤️‍🔥🐂❤️‍🔥 @BritishHodl]

Bitcoin and MSTR green on this selling news says market education is complete.

[David @candlelightowl]

@WalkerAmerica @elonmusk @fentasyl @spencerpratt Love your posts lately. Have a way of putting things

[Daniel Ƀrrr @csuwildcat]

It's funny how much BIP 110 is like post-911 TSA policies, where people (who are in this case mostly good-intentioned) try to stop 'the bad thing' with ham-fisted, incoherent governance spasms that make things worse in so many ways while failing at everything they set out to do.

[Adam Back @adam3us]

@lopp @JoeConsorti we await @joeconsorti's shoe eating ceremony👍

[Coinjoined Chris ⚡ @coinjoined]

Miniscript compiles to Bitcoin Script, and BIP110 would invalidate OP_IF in Taproot leaves while also banning tap trees deeper than seven levels. That would break years of work. While tools like Liana, Nunchuk, and AnchorWatch could adapt, there is virtually no benefit to BIP110, especially since BIP110 doesn't achieve anything material to reducing spam.

[David @candlelightowl]

RT @nvk: It's is incredible to see Americans openly freeing themselves from the decade of soft cultural communism.

Let this spirit spread…

[Jameson Lopp @lopp]

1) The OP_RETURN limit was never 80 bytes, that was a relay policy.
2) Inscriptions / 4 MB JPGs have nothing to do with OP_RETURN
3) 110 doesn't stop all of the tricks for encoding arbitrary data.
4) The conflict over arbitrary data actually dates back over a decade.
5) A tiny minority can't bluff their way to a successful UASF.
6) No miners are afraid of economically irrelevant Bitcoin Puritans.
7) Futures markets prediction the outcome of the BCH fork and they're predicting the outcome of 110.
8) Arbitrary data is actually less resource intensive for nodes to process.
9) If you think I'm wrong, my offer to engage in a trustless fork futures contract remains open.

[Coinjoined Chris ⚡ @coinjoined]

BIP110 makes ordinals less than 1% more expensive while breaking generic miniscript.
Great job @dathon_ohm 👏