@jasonfried@justinlewiswebs But you could scroll the old activity feed to see what has happened in a project or group of projects (folder) before. It wasn’t random.
Now you need to click so many times to know what is going on. Also a 15 year user and find it so hard without the old activity feed!
All for change but the change to the activity feed in @basecamp 5 is a serious downgrade. Can’t see what’s going on without way more clicks. No real feed in the project on mobile. It’s like going on X and only being able to see 10 characters. @dhh@jasonfried
@dhh Great ♥️ take your time. I presume tables are the 1 you’re not considering..
Think databases in notion but simpler.
Each line is a message - but you can organise and move around and have a couple extra fields for sorting etc.
Nothing complex but would make life easier
@dhh been using @basecamp for nearly 2 decades so thought I would give my 2 cents on what I think you should prioritise….as I’ve had to move some stuff away recently
1. MCP (it’s actually useful…and I was sceptical)
2. Tables - nothing fancy, just a v v v simple table
@therunetard@THORChain@Maya_Protocol Why does Thorchain not incentivise its creation using Rune as its base asset... as opposed to a full (albeit friendly) fork
@LomahCrypto All these buys are frontrunning the actual etf flows which will come months after the approval.
There is a gap
A lot of that same capital will rotate to Eth to frontrun that next. Possibly before the etf is announced.
@ErikVoorhees@EdwinTheDealer@THORChain On top of IL, you need capital to enter the short which reduces the ROIC. Then the short would need to pay funding, which would be massive (as most everyone entering would be short) and this would create mental volatility and protocol risk
@AaluxxMyth Honestly it’s a pretty big flaw and an absolutely unnecessary one. IL is a given and creates a liability on the protocol that is reflexive. The only thing that made it not sooo bad (but still bad) for rune was a lot of LPs were protocol owned