There is also another set of problems in my opinion. I see the problem in having outdated skills, plans, brainstorming sessions, all artefacts that are temporary and not re-evaluated regularly.
Why a function exists six months later, you can just check your git history. But of course if you didn't have any kind of pointer to the issue this was created from, this is a kind of workflow problem.
@housecor This is historical overhead. I guess they have had read same guidance as myself where you create rule files and hierarchical CLAUDE.md files. When you use the current 5er models, they don't need that ceremony anymore.
Start fresh!
@kunchenguid I'm expecting that this can be deleted, you should include a kind of backup, because this is yours ship source of truth.
/home/box/agent-data/grok-ship/factory.db
I wouldn't generalize this. I know a bunch of projects in time and budget. The secret is that you have to have a good relationship with the stakeholders. You understand their requirements and provide solutions that make sense not solutions that are beautifully dying in tech stacks.
@dustedcodes You can still write C# like it would be version 4.0.
And you don't need to use an IDE. I like Rider but I haven't touched it since a year. Nor did I touch any other IDE.
@BrianEDean Isn't a good bet. You assume that everything will stay as it is. It will not. In the end you won't be able to difference AI written content from yours.
Where do I report bugs or not obvious behavior to @cursor_ai ?
I have set the branch prefix in the settings, but the inline action commands don't respect those.