Fun to think about reviewers of famous papers. Someone read “it has not escaped our notice that the…pairing…postulated…suggests…copying mechanism for genetic material” and had to decide - publish?
Radical! At first I thought that was you in beard but now I’m thinking it’s you in the back with mustache. And where is BTW? Down in the basement coding?
@pkhaff Thinking more:
@ebgoldstein sent me this review (https://t.co/lV2qJ5wpKF) by Dyson. For stylistic approach to complex content, it’s a strong “write it like that” exemplar.
(When in doubt, make the sentence short, w/simple structure.)
That’s style, not process - but a way in.
We have a new preprint looking at road networks on 72 US Atlantic and Gulf barrier islands.
Led by @SofiAldabet & w/ @envidynxlab, and available on @EarthArXiv .
https://t.co/L2Zj8cUcJa
constructive feedback is very welcome!
Is chaos actually hard to predict? For NeurIPS this year I made a database of 131 known strange attractors, and trained state-of-the-art forecasting models on each one, to try to figure this out (1/N):
Paper: https://t.co/6tZ9MGAAI3
Dataset + Code: https://t.co/EpK4ZfWTEF
Maps like these make me wonder why we bother with GCMs. Call me naive, but arriving at the broad prediction that wet will get wetter and dry drier seems to beg only a little thermodynamics rather than legions of scientists peering into big computers.
https://t.co/I5LR1d1oYc
Our team @ScrippsOcean is recruiting a staff researcher. Fieldwork, analysis, and logistics. Please share, if appropriate. Details here: https://t.co/nasPQKPFe9
Filing deadline -- Monday, 30 Aug 2021 @100islchallenge