@dearmadisonblue The question of non-human consciousness is indeed interesting and quite curiosity-piquing, but it might not matter. Consciousness only matters within the subject. Everything around the subject, including conscious humans, is nothing but input and output.
@RapidResponse47@jgebbia “You see I am an enthusiast on the subject of the arts. But it is an enthusiasm of which I am not ashamed, as it's object is to improve the taste of my countrymen, to increase their reputation, to reconcile to them the respect of the world & procure them” – Thomas Jefferson
My god this is such a good speech that every SWE needs to hear. You know what? Every person should hear it
Keep the happy memories, eyes on the reality, be excited about the future. That’s the best that anyone can do
Yann LeCun: We’re not going to reach human-level intelligence or AGI simply by scaling LLMs.
“There’s absolutely no way in hell.”
“The idea that we’re going to have a data center full of geniuses is complete BS.”
“It might feel like you have a PhD sitting right beside you.”
“But that’s not what it is.”
“It’s a system with enormous memory and retrieval capabilities not a system that can genuinely come up with solutions to problems it has never seen before.”
Feels like ‘AI’ models are playing ping pong and we’re only vehicles. We enjoy passively observing, while doing got imposed through society’s collective mind and cumulative needs to solve small and big problems. If these are solved faster and better, we’ll be spectators, again.
@Jiacheng_Miao@Nature Great work, it’s been obvious for a while now that papers must become or at least have a very straightforward and structured output. It might take away some art of storytelling but the consequences are otherwise only beneficial.
GPT3 writing code. A compiler from natural language to code.
People don't understand — this will change absolutely everything. We're decoupling human horsepower from code production. The intellectual equivalent of the discovery of the engine. https://t.co/QGJbQRBdQv