@DrTedros@ACANU_Geneva@WHO the same fourth estate who, at least in America, is financially dependent (and therefore beholden to) advertising by pharmaceutical companies? That fourth estate, the one that hid, censored, and/or ignored McCullough, Kory, Cody, Barrington, etc?
less important today than ever.
@PattyMurray tell us which of your proposed common-sense laws would have prevented the tragedy at Brown? Oh, you don't have any specific proposals? Why is that?
Poor, dim Batty Murray.๐ฆ Don't be like Batty!๐คก
@DrTedros oh yeah, and just as an FYI:
this same Teddy the Brave, who is being oh-so-brave to say that vaccines to NOT cause autism is the same Teddy the Brave who told you that the COVID "vaccines" were safe and effective for your child...
@DrTedros Teddy the Brave is oh-so-brave when making all-encompassing, generic statements, that place himself on a false pedestal of moral superiority
Parents have both the RIGHT and the RESPONSIBILITY to review the risk/reward for each vax and determine WHEN/IF it is right for your child
@RMConservative yes, but as you point out, primaries are still all about name recognition, leading to weak-sauce candidates. We need to get back to conventions, where an informed electorate select from the cast of characters.
@laralogan we don't need _more_ regulations to fix this, we need less! allow farmers and ranchers to sell without inane laws that do nothing but make it so everything consolidates (into "four big packers")
@DrTedros "health" is a "state", such as "good health" or "bad health". no one has a "right" to "good health"
access to "health care" that is available in your culture and geographic location is a human right.
Teddy the Brave should be oh-so-brave to stop conflating these two concepts
@WHO for the sake of argument, let's exclude autism:
-is it still ok to ask "WHEN" a specific vaccine is appropriate to get?
-is it still ok for the WHO to recommend actions that produce safety (such as monogomy and abstention)?
-is it still OK to weigh risks/rewards?
@PattyMurray is our Senator actually saying that premiums will not increase unless R's vote to continue subsidies?
how will the "premiums" increase, Senator Murray? Or will the "premiums" stay the same but the "subsidies" (which you said were "temporary") decrease?
Gaslighting us?
@WHO maybe instead of making a general statement, Teddy the Brave might be oh so brave as to instruct his WHO to call out where in the world is the worst part of the problem, and demand their governments take care of their people instead of just barking at the moon.
well, @DrTedros??
@WHO does "Informed Consent" include being told the risks/benefits of the timing to receive a vaccine?
does "Bodily autonomy & integrity" apply to humans yet unborn and to humans near their end of life?
when in our life-to-death journey do "human rights" become begin/end?
@WHO clarifying questions: at what point in an individual human's life-to-death journey do "human rights" become active? at what point in an individual human's journey do "human rights" end?
just trying to find out who is included in the "ALL" in #HealthForAll?
@WHO "health" is a "state" - your health is what it is; you do not have a right to any state of health.
access to the "health care" provided in your culture and community is a "human right".
clarifying question: does "bodily autonomy" and "freedom from violence" apply to the unborn?