@JAccuse50103848@ScienceMagazine Well that's a double-edged sword, because eventually you have to deal with the assholes, and you leave them to gossip about you while you're absent. But depending on the support you get from the higher-ups at work, that's at least a temporary tactic.
@CENTCOM Please stick to your usual military mode of communication and refrain from Trump-directed political narratives. You didn't swear your oath to him, remember?
@DrTomFrieden CDC warns, NOW??? They were complicit in this in the first place. (or, more likely, their bosses not the civil servants who are the only experts)
@SkinnerPm All of those prez' are surpassed by the one we are looking at right now. Incredible timing; he always uses the adjective against others that most applies to him at that moment.
@AdamMGrossman@EVD271@SenSanders Accurate to point this out, but should have been done this way in the first place. (sorry I call them like I see them, but I also appreciate 99.999% of your posts!)
@BeschlossDC And Trump's DOJ just declared that he could demolish it if he wanted and no one could stop him. What has happened to us? We don't have to be this way.
@SkinnerPm I am a retired doc, not a lawyer, but I suspect most professionals discover that the practice of their field is not as satisfying as the study of it. That said, having a strong sense of purpose offsets that quite a bit.
@WakeUp2Politics@realDonaldTrump SCOTUS is an even better example if she wants to prattle about 'unelected' (a favorite republican target btw, why?). Let's have term limits for them too, eh Marsha?
@EricTopol Pathologists like me know that breast cancer is often culmination of progressive pre-cancer changes over years. So now question will be - at what point will AI call it 'cancer'? Important treatment implications.
@NOTUSreports How many thousands did they waste our money scrutinizing, in order to come up with 17 people? This is a joke. You need to find out how many they screened and at what cost.