Top Tweets for #AetherCos

>>It has been thoroughly debunked a few moments after it got out.<< On the contrary, that person went to a location the amount of refraction was predicted to be enough to make the star's geocentric position = the fe angle to the peak and the star's apparent observer centric position was equal to the GE angle. Our null hypothesis and methodology is about geometric intersections. In every scenario for Old Blyn and Ediz Blyn, the full arc length had to be traversed before the star emerged. Refraction had no impact on effecting the time because at the time the star actually emerged, it's apparent position was predicted to be 3' over the peak already, which means it would have emerged 17 seconds earlier. Read here to learn about the refraction analysis and how in ever scenario the FE angle gets geometrically recovered as a consequence of the correction. Even when attempting to game the method, the truth was revealed in the timing differences. Our method stands and it would be impossible to say it was debunked going to a location where they would be the same. Although the results were in our favor anyways. Geometric > optical https://t.co/tzbQnlD0jL https://t.co/sYPG1iruZd https://t.co/xBRu6IBHhv https://t.co/mHoQN1NbTf