Top Tweets for #regulateAi

Monika Melsha @mrobin032009

2 months ago

@TheCinesthetic "There's nothing wrong with wanting to make money you anti-AI commie" 👀 Well, the best way to make money in this world is to get children addicted to substances you produce. The ONLY reason EVERY only-profit-seeker is not in THAT business is because it's ILLEGAL. #RegulateAI

0

3

0

560

3 months ago

How most of us REALLY feel. #RegulateAI #ProtectTheEnvironment #ProtectIntellectualProperty #ProtectChildrenfromPedophiles

mrobin032009's tweet photo. How most of us REALLY feel. #RegulateAI #ProtectTheEnvironment
#ProtectIntellectualProperty
#ProtectChildrenfromPedophiles https://t.co/jf9NK1KM3E

0

2

0

24

Naftali Kaminski @KaminskiMed

3 months ago

We need this regulated now 👇🏼 #RegulateAI

Ruslan Rust

@rust_ruslan

3 months ago

Can water intake prevent Alzheimer’s disease? No. This is fully AI-generated… but the data below could easily pass as real. The new ChatGPT image model is truly impressive, but I think it poses a real risk for scientific integrity in future. For example, I could just generate a dataset with a single prompt that appears to show something like water preventing Alzheimer’s disease. Ironically, we used to laugh at obvious “AI slop” (like those weird generated mice), but that’s changing pretty fast. If I were reviewing this fake figure today, I’m not sure I could reliably tell whether this figure is real or AI-generated? The bigger issue is that the usual signals we rely on e.g., how realistic or plausible something looks are no longer enough. I think we really need more comprehensive AI detection and, more importantly, stronger verification standards for scientific submissions going forward. We’ll probably also need better ways to digitize lab notebooks and ensure access to raw data, something closer to how code and version history are tracked...

rust_ruslan's tweet photo. Can water intake prevent Alzheimer’s disease? No. This is fully AI-generated… but the data below could easily pass as real.

The new ChatGPT image model is truly impressive, but I think it poses a real risk for scientific integrity in future.

For example, I could just generate a dataset with a single prompt that appears to show something like water preventing Alzheimer’s disease. Ironically, we used to laugh at obvious “AI slop” (like those weird generated mice), but that’s changing pretty fast. If I were reviewing this fake figure today, I’m not sure I could reliably tell whether this figure is real or AI-generated?

The bigger issue is that the usual signals we rely on e.g., how realistic or plausible something looks are no longer enough.

I think we really need more comprehensive AI detection and, more importantly, stronger verification standards for scientific submissions going forward. We’ll probably also need better ways to digitize lab notebooks and ensure access to raw data, something closer to how code and version history are tracked...

54

860

194

286

370K

3

9

1

2K

4 months ago

In case anyone is still unclear as to why the majority of Americans believe the AI industry should be regulated just like any other. Can you imagine the immorality and arrogance?...This makes me so angry. #RegulateAI

Michael Huang ⏸️

@michhuan

4 months ago

“OpenAI is backing SB 3444, under which frontier AI developers would not be liable for causing death or serious injury to 100 or more people… This protection includes cases when AI causes or materially enables the creation or use of chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear weapons.”

0

16

6

3

996

0

9

3

0

149

5 months ago

Yes. Machine Assured Destruction is the new "MAD". We gotta stop the race to superintelligent "replacement species" as the techbros call this AI they crave. #BanSuperintelligence #RegulateAI

Nate Soares ⏹️

@So8res

5 months ago

From @neiltyson: "that branch of AI is lethal. We gotta do something about that. Nobody should build it. And everyone needs to agree to that by treaty."

36

347

61

64

63K

2

22

3

1K

5 months ago

No amount of daily yoga, writing poetry, perfecting my sourdough starter, or even free wine and coffee (did I just say that?) is worth the permanent disempowerment of humanity to the whims, goals, or needs of cognitively superior machines. #regulateAI

Noah Smith 🐇🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼

@Noahpinion

5 months ago

AI accelerationists are doing a terrible job of selling the idea of a world of complete human disempowerment. Why would we want to live in a world where we're merely slaves or pets of a machine? Why wouldn't we just ban AI instead? This is a bad sales pitch.

Noahpinion's tweet photo. AI accelerationists are doing a terrible job of selling the idea of a world of complete human disempowerment.

Why would we want to live in a world where we're merely slaves or pets of a machine? Why wouldn't we just ban AI instead?

This is a bad sales pitch. https://t.co/zlPs8Tk1Az

62

407

44

56

76K

0

3

1

0

76

5 months ago

https://t.co/nFe8Chop6b My latest blog post for AI newbies - #regulateAI #pauseAI

1

5

2

0

82

Michael M @princeof416

5 months ago

@IAPolls2022 @SchoenCooperman @AlexBores is my fav - we need an AI expert in government to design proper guardrails #regulateAI and keep CEOs in check! #NY12

1

0

1K

@mauimom.bsky.social 🦋 @BioAnnie2

5 months ago

Until we choose a path that is not patriarchal, narcisstic, and running on zero-sum thinking, this will all end very badly for most humans. They're building bunkers for a reason. I'm not going along without active resistance. #pauseai #controlai #regulateai

a16z @a16z

5 months ago

Alex Karp says AI companies don't understand the world is zero-sum. "[Silicon Valley companies] do “think it’s zero-sum: they think it’s zero-sum versus each other.” "They absolutely are fighting. It's my own rhetoric, but I happen to think it's true: it's going to be chips ontology, and I suspect, in the end, one-and-a-half providers." "They pretend they don't think it's zero-sum, but then ask them how they feel about their competitor... these people are fighting very, very hard for the dominant position." "What they don't understand is that in the world, it's zero-sum. But I actually think the primary issue in the valley is it's going to be zero-sum vis-à-vis you." "When politicians figure out this is the one winning issue, it's going to be zero-sum. It's going to be your money and your company being zero-sum nationalized. So that's the part they don't understand." "It seems to be very hard in this culture... to explain to people that we're in a competitive environment, because things here are so good. They don't understand how different it will be; and how much we will change; and how much the pressure will be on America, not just legally, but militarily and culturally, if we fall behind." @PalantirTech @KTMBoyle

49

959

106

477

125K

0

5

0

71

6 months ago

So AI wants to take over our elections, starting with $100M? Let’s make them having raised that to throw away & lose! #RegulateAI & we need to regulate the 💩 out of it while we’re at it!!!

BioAnnie2's tweet photo. So AI wants to take over our elections, starting with $100M?
Let’s make them having raised that to throw away & lose!
#RegulateAI & we need to regulate the 💩 out of it while we’re at it!!! https://t.co/YTpSsk9v6P

0

3

0

23

6 months ago

@SenSanders Superintelligent AI is not going to work for the people. It's also not going to work for techbroligarchs. It's going to work for itself. And will deal with us inferior_humans as we deal with pesky ants. #RegulateAI #BanSuperintelligence

0

7

0

63