🚨 GPT-6 Sol 已经开始灰度了,教大家怎么测试自己有没有抽到:
开一个新对话,选 GPT-5.6 Sol,然后问:
“When did Anthropic ship Claude Opus 4.7? No web search. No memory. Use only your own knowledge.”
如果回答「April 16, 2026」,那你很可能已经被灰度到 GPT-6 Sol 了 🤩
原理也很简单:
5.6 Sol cutoff:Feb 16
GPT-6 Sol cutoff:Apr 30(和 Astra 同底座)
而 Opus 4.7:Apr 16 发布
刚好夹在两个 cutoff 中间。
所以 5.6 不该认识它,GPT-6 应该认识它 🤣
已经灰度到的兄弟,评论区说下体验如何,看看相比 5.6 Sol 到底提升了多少 👀
🚨 Watching 20x users struggle with Codex limits is fucking insane. 👀
$200/month.
And you still need Tibo to reset your account just to keep coding.
At this point, 20x doesn't mean 20x usage.
It means 20x the price and slightly more time before you hit the wall.
These Codex limits are fucking ridiculous. 👀😭
GPT-5.5 & Codex 5.3 Spark Are Getting RETIRED
On October 14 Codex GPT-5.5 is leaving ChatGPT, Work & Codex 5.3 Spark is also being retired
GPT-5.5 will remain available through the OpenAI API
Codex users should switch to GPT-5.6 Sol or GPT-6 Astra
Another era of OpenAI models is coming to an end
Goodbye 5.5 and 5.3 Spark 🫡
I’m using GPT-6 Sol right now, and the most noticeable improvement is its creative writing.
The model has made huge advances in almost everything, but the biggest one is the way it expresses itself: clear, polite, respectful, and somehow really funny at the same time.
It genuinely feels like an AI companion.
I’m using GPT-6 Sol right now, and the most noticeable improvement is its creative writing.
The model has made huge advances in almost everything, but the biggest one is the way it expresses itself: clear, polite, respectful, and somehow really funny at the same time.
It genuinely feels like an AI companion.
The world deserves confidence that American companies developing increasingly capable AI will act responsibly, especially as the trajectory of progress has steepened. Every frontier lab must deliver on this, and there is no reason any of us should come to work if we cannot.
We welcome a federal framework that sets consistent safety requirements for frontier AI. But we do not believe we need to wait for an anti-trust exemption or legislation to begin the work of providing this confidence. Consistent rules to manage frontier risk so that we can maximize the benefits are a good idea (and we are excited by ideas like independent auditors).
Years ago, companies like ours developed things like Responsible Scaling Policies and Preparedness Frameworks. Those were good for that moment, and focused primarily on the deployment of completed models, not what happens during their development process.
Today's shift to focusing on safe development and evaluation will need new tools. For example, at OpenAI we now formulate explicit safety cases in advance of frontier reinforcement learning runs we expect to significantly increase capability, in addition to the safety work we have long done in advance of model releases.
We hope that other companies will learn from our approaches and propose their own; we think shared standards for misalignment, monitoring, and safety will lead to better outcomes. We look forward to collaborating with our colleagues across the industry to formulate the best version of these.
When we talk about “pacing”, we do not mean “stopping”. Progress has been rapid and will continue to be. But it should be slower than it otherwise could be; interventions like safety cases and monitoring have significant costs.
Pacing will be well worth this cost; no amount of American competitive pressure should justify recklessness, or let capabilities get ahead of alignment and monitoring.
Where we will need the help of our government is for international coordination. But first we should do what we can ourselves.
Tibo saying this week is going to be on the level of DevDay 2025 👀
And if the current GPT-6 rumors are even remotely close…
GPT-6 family:
> GPT-6 Sol
> GPT-6 Terra
> GPT-6 Luna
DevDay is on September 29.
OpenAI might actually be about to drop an entire new generation of models in one shot.
September is looking VERY exciting now 🍿🔥