@Sveronz0@DOGElonMusk420@tomba29119096@assembly_net@iota I think thatโs outdated. SMR staking would make it inflationary. They changed that to make SMR more similar to IOTA, so implementation would not get more complicated.
@iotabots No way. As I learned, the difference has to do with the head. A bolt is fastened using (radially) external features of the head (hexagonal head shape), and we call it a screw when the tool grips on internal features of the head, like Philips, torx etc.
@GardnerTycho@GaaDDtt@engineers_feed Funny thing is, all the calculations for putting a man on the moon were done in metric, as most science is done in metric. How about that?
@NagarjunKC@torybruno To me, the 541 is the most awkward. The side with 3 SRB slots feels like it should have the middle slot empty. Iโve asked this before, might have to do with avionics pod?
@torybruno I always understood why itโs asymmetrical because of the LOX feed line. But what I donโt understand is why the 541 configuration with the 4 SRBโs donโt have a symmetrical configuration. To me it always seemed more logical to leave the middle position free.
686 pounds of wood is approximately the energy required for one #Bitcoin transaction (rough conversion of hardwood to 980 KWh). For one #IOTA transaction it is about 50 mg of wood, which is exactly 1/2 a toothpick.