I analyzed Bryan Johnson’s biomarkers… and he doesn’t have the best in the world.
I analyzed 65 of the markers he’s published:
-44 of them I have better results
-9 of them, Bryan has better results
-12 of them are equal
In this thread, I’m sharing the markers and comparing them⬇️⬇️
P.S.
1. I’m not claiming I'm the healthiest person alive or to have the world’s best biomarkers—but I do have factually better biomarkers than Bryan.
There are dozens of people who have better biomarkers than Bryan and me out there.
2. This isn’t about “dunking” on Bryan. Bryan always asks for people to challenge his results and prove if someone has better markers, so here I am.
3. I disagree that you can base someone's health solely on biomarkers because biomarkers can be gamed with pharmaceuticals, etc. But I'm just playing Bryan's own game here.
4. Age is a moot point. Bryan says he has the best biomarkers of anyone in the world. If chronological age mattered, the “healthiest person” would always be an 18–20-year-old.
I’m 30, and my biomarkers are better than his, so his claim doesn’t hold. He could argue he’s the healthiest 47-year-old, but not the healthiest overall.
Now that this is out of the way, let's go through all the biomarkers.
When Ethereum hits $5,000 I will give 1 ETH to ten people who follow me.
The rules are simple:
- like this tweet, follow me and RT
- comment “5k incoming”
Let’s go! $ETH