Turns out, the hardest part of building a robotics platform wasn't writing the code.
It was learning what users actually needed.
Building future of robot simulation @ https://t.co/HOgks9lIRH
A stunning piece of engineering!!
1X unveils the new humanoid hand for NEO
- 25 degrees of freedom: 22 fully actuated in the fingers and palm, plus 3 at the wrist.
- The DoF are distributed anatomically rather than evenly, deliberately biased toward a thumb that genuinely opposes the fingers.
- In-house tendon-driven, quasi-direct-drive running low gear ratios of ~5:1 to 15:1 vs the typical 100:1β200:1.
- Motors live in the forearm and pull tendons through the wrist. This keeps the hand light and its inertia low while producing high forces.
Sensing
- All 25 DoF are natively force-controlled and fully backdrivable. Every joint doubles as a force sensor.
- Very important, closed-loop proprioception: it always knows its own pose and effort without looking.
- Tactile skin across the fingertips and surfaces measuring contact and shear. This helps with adaptive gripping in real time.
Safety and durability
- IP68 waterproof and food-safe, so it can wash its own hands.
- Compliant by construction: the low gear ratios, tendon drive, and low distal inertia let external impacts safely backdrive the fingers. It yields when hit by a hammer or caught in a drawer.
- Full finger assemblies validated to millions of cycles.
Manufacturing
- Deep vertical integration: in-house motors, custom electronics, and tendon systems.
- Hundreds built already, with capacity to produce 10,000 hands this year.
"An API to the Physical World"
Data, not compute or models, is the #1 bottleneck for embodied AI -- physical trajectories don't scrape like internet text.
(reading) https://t.co/MVI6bpuXhh
Today robotics gold rush isnβt in building another robot.
Itβs in owning the data pipeline that teaches robots how the physical world actually works.
Hardware commoditizes. High-signal physical data does not.
ASPIRE (@nvidia) is a robot agent that learns how to debug & remember. interesting to see code-as-policy where people simply use claude-code/codex to control the robots!
(i am particularly impressed by the performance)
https://t.co/6DJ32yJI9n
@lucyjcai In my undergrad I used to prosthetic limbs (patented), some FIRST Robotics style robots, self-balancing, line followers, and more lol
Now, it's more into companionship and industrial robots, depending on which team I'm working with
Now I'm into WAMs @ GM.
If you could read just one paper from each area of Robotics, make it these:
β’ Motion Planning β RRT (Rapidly-exploring Random Trees)
β’ SLAM / Navigation β FastSLAM
β’ Imitation Learning β DAgger
β’ Sim-to-Real Transfer β Domain Randomization
β’ Robotic Grasping β Dex-Net
β’ Continuous Control β Soft Actor-Critic (SAC)
β’ Legged Locomotion β Learning to Walk via Deep RL (ANYmal)
β’ Vision-Language-Action β RT-1 (Robotics Transformer)
If you want to actually understand VLAs (not just run someone's checkpoint), read these in order:
1. RT-1 (transformers can drive a robot)
2. RT-2 (the paper that coined "VLA" β web knowledge β actions as tokens)
3. Open X-Embodiment (data diversity beats one perfect robot)
4. OpenVLA (a 7B VLA you can actually fine-tune)
5. Ο0 (flow-matching action expert, the current frontier)