@HealthRanger Imagine believing that looking at a light in the sky, has anything at all to do with the layout of the ground. Imagine...
Learn some logic. It helps.
@HawkInATX@ViroLIEgy@KITTYKAT99@Bio_inspiration@CarlSmytheCells There is no valid hypothesis in virology, as the presumed cause hasn't been shown to exist in nature.
Not to mention the DV (CPE) is also not valid. That's not the effect seen in reality. It's a contrived effect used to question beg and affirm the consequent about "viruses"
@HawkInATX@ViroLIEgy@KITTYKAT99@Bio_inspiration@CarlSmytheCells The IV, by definition, is the presumed cause, and is the "thing" varied and manipulated BY the researcher to attempt to validate the alternative hypothesis. It is of course an "experimental intervention", by definition.
You're struggling here.
@HawkInATX@ViroLIEgy@Bio_inspiration@KITTYKAT99@CarlSmytheCells "growth in culture media" is not a viable DV. It's not the effect we see in nature.
application of foreign material to culture media is not a viable IV. It's not the hypothesis for the cause of the EFFECT in NATURE.
You need to try harder at this. Wow.
@KITTYKAT99@ViroLIEgy@Bio_inspiration@HawkInATX@CarlSmytheCells You do realize this paper is not scientific, and already begs the question of "virus". (you do know what "question begging" means...right?)
We need scientific validation. IE, existence of the presumed cause, then hypothesis, experiment, etc, etc. Please provide that. thx.
@KITTYKAT99@ViroLIEgy@Bio_inspiration@HawkInATX@CarlSmytheCells Nice burden of proof reversal. You want Mike to "explain" something he's not claiming?? I can make up any story I want to "explain" the "basic of all life on earth". Doesn't make it true.
Back up your claims. No question begging allowed.
@Alec_Zeck Bingo. And any right-thinking person (IE, not an "academic") can understand such a thing.
Still waiting for a single paper showing any particles found IN HUMANS being proven as the cause of disease. and waiting..and waiting.