@atelicinvest I think this is selection bias on your part. I have a bias toward higher prices (but no background whatsoever) and the oil experts I follow are doing very introspective work rn on why they were wrong
@partners_road Law of large numbers? I'd imagine this looks similar to high end real estate in NYC, vs somewhere like Miami where the base for high end RE was lower in 1998
@michaeljmcnair@notanobject@npresc I think the idea that you can always 100% defend physical infra (whether with cheap lasers or something else) is naive. If Iran wants to blow up infra, they’ll find a way to do it. You need to keep it not in their interests to do so
@JerryCap it's just really hard to get excited about this when they are clearly leaning on an adjusted number. If your incrementals are so good why not disclose what else you're adjusting for?
@christianoboria@atelicinvest@GavinSBaker he is saying that even with incredible AI model capabilities, there is a question about the incremental efficiency gains for a corporate worker with great AI. 5% maybe. 20%? 50%? In finance I'd say 10% is fair for the next 1-2 years
@dennisihong@FundamentEdge if they've had no investment experience, I don't see how this added context is helpful. Investment first then ML. Students should have better AI instincts than senior investors already at this point