@caderoas The clearest real-world proof of this is LTCM in '98 - two Nobel laureates, a model built on correlations that barely moved for years, 25-to-1 leverage.
EVERYTHING YOU HAVE EVER SEEN, TOUCHED, OR BEEN IS LESS THAN 5% OF WHAT EXISTS.
In the 1970s, astronomer Vera Rubin was measuring how fast stars orbit at the edges of spiral galaxies.
Newton said outer stars should move slower, like planets far from the sun. Instead, every single galaxy she checked showed the same thing: stars at the edge moved just as fast as stars near the core.
She wasn't discovering new physics.
She was measuring the gap left over after every known source of gravity had been subtracted.
That leftover has a name: dark matter.
It doesn't emit light, doesn't block it, and has never been directly detected.
But it makes up roughly 27% of the universe - and every confirmation since Rubin has used the same method: subtract what you can explain, then take the leftover seriously.
@astro4pics we're now using AI to sharpen photos of things AI barely existed when we first tried to capture. 2017 data getting a 2023 glow up says a lot about how fast this moved
@hayyantechtalks 10 septillion years is a number so big it stops meaning anything, which is exactly why it's the wrong stat to be impressed by. the error correction part is the actual story
@Qtumanalysis 13 miles through open air with no cable sounds small until you remember entanglement dies if you look at it wrong. this race isn't about kilometers, it's about who keeps the signal alive longest
@mathemetica algebra becomes geometry and geometry becomes destiny might be the most unhinged and correct way to describe control theory I've seen all year
@Kylechasse a new state of matter that isn't solid, liquid, or gas either ages into a physics textbook chapter or gets quietly downgraded to promising research. rooting for the textbook version
@NextScience doesn't let information travel faster than light is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence. the universe found a loophole and still won't let us use it
@matthewmillerai AGI by end of year has been said every year since 2023. the tell isn't the timeline, it's that people keep listing specific model weaknesses right after saying it