1/ Our founder's family lost ₹10L+ to a chit fund. The organiser held the pot, and then he didn't. In India this isn't rare. It's how chits usually fail. So we're building ManaCircle, where no single person ever holds the pot. 🧵
@sandeepnailwal So true. In 70+ calls with chit members in India, nobody asked which chain.
The first question is always who holds the money. Rails win when the answer is nobody.
@saxenasaheb@ycombinator@base Hey Saumya, we're applying too.
Building on-chain savings circles on Base. Chit funds without one person holding the pot, starting with India and building for everyone.
@RamThote_ Skipping the SMS access part is a smart call.
Curious if you'll track chits too? 1 in 3 South Indians aged 30 to 50 is in one and no app ever sees that money.
@NeelChhabra So the bet is that people will pay once UPI stops being free...
From our chit calls, people already give the organiser a ~5% cut without blinking. They don't mind paying, they mind not seeing where it goes.
Two of our co-founders audit smart contracts for a living.
@gowtham_ponnana alone has done 80+ audits and helped secure $600M+ during live exploits. When something breaks on-chain at 3 AM, he's usually one of the people in the war room.
So when we sat down to design ManaCircle, the first rule was simple. The protocol should never hold custody of user funds. Not during a payout, not during an upgrade, not in any situation.
That's how the contracts are architected and written. There's no pot sitting with us, no admin key that can move your money, no one person to trust.
Savings circles run everywhere. Chits in India, tandas in Mexico, susus in Ghana, stokvels in South Africa. They almost always fail the same way, when one person controls the pot. We didn't want to rebuild that problem on-chain.
We're starting with India and building for everyone. Rules on-chain on @base.
@oracles@mansourtarek_@luanalopeslara@Kalshi Everything is distribution really...
For money products the best one is still word of mouth inside a community. That's how chit funds in India got so big, one relative asking another.
@akhil_bvs@base This is really helpful Akhil.
Would love to see an RFB around group savings for India. The behaviour already exists offline at huge scale, just nobody has taken the pot out of one person's hands yet.
@LightspeedIndia@SuperLivingApp Same thing in consumer finance in India.
Chit apps can copy the UI in a week. What they can't copy is a group of 10 people who already trust each other with ₹10,000 a month. That trust is the real moat I believe.
@IamFisovee A stokvel that sends year end statements with deadlines is run better than most chits back in India 😂
Members here mostly find out the balance when the organiser decides to tell them.
@buildonbase@saxenasaheb@saxenasaheb replying "what are you building?" to everyone is honestly underrated.
For consumer finance apps in India the hard part is mostly INR on-ramps and compliance, not the contracts. Would love to see more help there.
@ORFMumbai Full backing and liquidity within days is exactly what chit members want from their organiser too...
Most of them only find out the money isn't there when the payout is due.
@nemild@ycombinator One use case I'd love to see on that list is group savings.
1 in 5 adults in emerging markets is in a savings circle, and the pot still sits with one person earning nothing. Stablecoins fix both of those really well.
@findyoursunset 0.55% is wild...
Same story with chit pools in India. Lakhs sit idle between payouts earning nothing. Savers always get the worst deal on idle money.
@Debica0@safrochain So true. Nobody back home cared about blockchain until we talked about their monthly chit.
Show people something they already do every month, minus one person holding the money. That clicks way faster than any tech talk.
@AntlerIndia Savings circle apps in the US mostly died early (Tanda, Puddle, eMoneyPool)...
I believe the lesson was distribution has to come from inside the community, not ads. Curious if Embark founders see the same with diaspora products?
We've spoken to 70+ chit members and organisers so far.
Almost nobody wants to leave their group. They just want to stop trusting one person with the money.
That's why ManaCircle is built for closed circles. Your people, rules on-chain on @base.