@Rotevatn Innlegget fra IFE handler om SMR, ikke kjernekraft generelt. Barakah i UAE ble bygget (inkludert overskridelser) til 5900 eur per kW. Altså mener de at det allerede er lønnsomt med opptil 4.6GW installert kjernekraftkapasitet, og støtter med andre ord at kjernekraft er lønnsomt🤷♂️
@PRingholm Helt enig i hovedargumentet, men 43% gjelder LNG, ikke gass generelt (LNG+pipeline gass). USA leverer ca 25% av all gass to Europa.
(Et annet spørsmål er hva Norge har greid å få ut av den formidable posisjonen man er i)
@SanderTordoir Why not focus on what really matters: Fix the energy situation (nuclear, oil, gas) and then let capitalism find a way to solve the productivity problem by letting it do what it does best: Optimize and incentivise innovation?
The need for more batteries on the grid cannot become more evident than after yesterday's event in Spain. It is no accident that this happened where it happened the way it happened, with all the solar installed in Spain. regardless of the root cause.
(8/8) By 2050, China will have 8,7 TW of total electricity production capacity, 4x that of 🇺🇸. If we dont do anything about this, China will beat the US&🇪🇺 industrially, driven by low cost, highly abundant power. Batteries makes cheap☀️and 💨more useful, while we wait for⚛️
CATL has 37,5% of the global🔋cell market. CEO Robert Zang on @norgesbank's podcast shrugs off any competition and tells 🇪🇺 why we cannot get it right. Or can we? And what does this have to do with the moon race🚀, high-speed trains🚄 and ⚛ power? A🧵https://t.co/VetkgR4Htq
(7/8) Why does this matter? In the🇺🇸, it costs about 3x for 1 new kWh of capacity vs in🇨🇳 and we must catch up on PV, wind,🔋and nuclear (but nuclear will take time). China has given us the playbook on how to catch up📒- let us use it? https://t.co/VsdFDK70vl