Maxsos

分享有趣的謎因短片

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

2026 全新高能洗腦神曲《尬電！尬電！》正式上線！ 這是一首獻給所有在虛擬煙霧中迷失、卻在最後一秒被現實一巴掌拍醒的現代社畜。不管你拜耶穌、拜觀音，還是相信大數據的圖騰，真正的命運密碼，其實一直在你手裡！
https://t.co/uRhv8tYrJ7

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

《尬電！尬電！》
不管耶穌、觀音，還是紫色的外星人…… 哼，還是靠自己比較實在。

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

大盤破四萬點的風，真的好冷…… 你今天，也站在山頂嗎？當身邊的朋友每個人都變成了「少年股神」， 看看自己停滯不前的薪水，除了把最後的年終梭哈進大盤，多斜槓接幾個工作?? 我們還有什麼開外掛的機會？聽完這首歌，明天，還是要準時打卡上班喔。https://t.co/yoU9Fin54o

[Dreamchik @DreamchikTwit]

YouTube took $4,510.59 from me. @TeamYouTube

On October 12, 2023, my channel was demonetized.
I submitted an appeal, but it was rejected.

So I followed the rules and waited 90 days.

During those 90 days, I changed NOTHING.
Didn’t delete a single video
Didn’t edit anything
Just kept uploading new content

After 90 days, I reapplied…

And monetization was restored instantly. No issues. No warnings. No changes required.

So I have a question for YouTube:

If my channel was actually violating policies,
why did those violations disappear after 90 days without a single change?

And if there were no real violations in the end,
on what basis was monetization disabled in the first place?

And the main question:

Can this be considered that YouTube simply took my $4,510.59?
Or is there another explanation for this situation?

If the channel was accepted back without any changes,
why does the creator take the loss?

This is an old case, but people should be aware:

This can happen.

Channel - https://t.co/inowxsKILJ

Is this normal? @TeamYouTube @YouTubeCreators @YouTube

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

@johnAGI168 光線真的絕了，通常不會用"絕了"，改"超漂亮"會更好 哈哈

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

@Envision_Deep @TeamYouTube It seems that I've also seen cases where other people didn't do anything and still got their channel back after three months.

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

@Envision_Deep @TeamYouTube First, congratulations on this good news! So how did it recover?? No reason???

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

@BattlerPogo @shazyoutube @sin_cama @TeamYouTube Agreed, this way we won't even have the chance to improve.

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

@shazyoutube @YouTube @iamdavenick @Animeako126 @OldMoneyLuxury @OlekChaseCar @mister_manners_ @anotherdive @Fascinatorfacts @FefeDemeny @bjr2730 @adamatik_0 @lakkyninja @OptSZN @Inshow_Off @enricovincente @rjswiftofficial @xtunis1a @LilSoftieGacha @historicoenperu @D_YellowMadness @rospinam @realhjubi @ItzFe4rLessyt @bbgstreams1 @XavierR0BLX @TypicalFemboy69 @sirsaltine7 @CulpritChronic @allin1adukkala @Pbkbiswajitbhai @howaboutstar @niokanal @miisa_princess @LoraMa393996 @LogoFan2010 @gamer77711804 @MunnaVdoo @Thebibleseen @krsreal @nyasahi @SalonikaGiwrgos @LeDramatic_ @andixsk @Lincoln712191 @rarachosen1 @Anthony_82 @AJMckenzie94847 @minter285 @bjfranzy thx!!

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

@NotMatrixFR @BattlerPogo @mister_manners_ @BrodyFoxx @rjswiftofficial @chloe_xozy @ItzFe4rLessyt @enricoanimated This is ridiculous...

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

@shazyoutube I remember I wrote it down, the channel is ApexMax, but it seems it's not on the form.

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

@chloe_xozy It really hurts to hear that.

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

Please send me a DM so I can share the link for your HUMAN REVIEW. This is urgent as it affects my ongoing curriculum.

@TeamYouTube @YouTubeCreators @nealmohan @GoogleOne Please check the classroom records and project files I've prepared."

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

@TeamYouTube I have already contacted the support team (Case 0-0685000040563), but they mentioned this is "out of their scope" to restore the channel. However, I have crucial evidence (CGI project files & classroom photos) that proves the video was a technical misjudgment.

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

@mister_manners_ @BrodyFoxx @chloe_xozy @thedarkarchive4 @Rahimkhan_id @Dexerto @UpdatesFromYT Happy New Year, me too, heartbroken...

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

Having maintained a clean record for 10 years, I request that the standard "Warning" or "Three Strikes" policy be applied if there are still concerns. Please look at the actual video content, not just the AI-flagged frames.https://t.co/sAJ3poweAG

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

The AI likely misinterpreted the light-colored clothing and high-speed movement during the backflip as nudity. These are pure entertainment shorts involving CGI stunts and have NO sexual intent or suggestive content. I’ve uploaded all original files to my appeal for verification.

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

@TeamYouTube "Thanks for the support! I have an official YouTube case (1-7549000040366). I’ve also submitted original footage and a detailed README explanation via supplemental case (0-0685000040563). Please ensure the review team checks these materials for the human review of ApexMax. Thank!

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

@TeamYouTube My channel [ApexMax] was banned without a single warning/strike. The video (a gorilla clip) was misinterpreted as sexual content. As a 10-year creator & Google One subscriber, I request a human review.

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

According to YouTube’s Community Guidelines, a first-time violation typically results in a Warning and an opportunity to complete a policy training session—not an instant permanent ban. Why was the standard "Warning" and "3-Strike" process bypassed in this case?

[Maxsos @maxsos100]

According to your policy (pic attached), a first violation deserves a Warning/Training, not a permanent ban. I have already revoked all external managers to ensure full compliance. Please help!