osmarks

I have opinions. You are required to agree with them.

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@AsaCoopStick Unfortunately, coordination on not building a machine god to devour all value is apparently impossible.

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@Hog_Milanese @matpolloy I talked to someone just this morning who enjoys the touchscreens. I think this may be another of those demand-side problems.

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@wordgrammer This is obviously stupid. Human society recursively self-improves in the relevant sense. So do some humans. I am sure you can come up with some sense in which it's invalid, but it won't make you not paperclips.

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@leowebbhk @AndrewCurran_ I think it's very asymmetric, and moreover that we don't have "competent states" anywhere.

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@thePartyPartyUS He pays attention to existing AI, which puts him among the best available.

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@thePartyPartyUS * Rajaniemi, sorry.

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@thePartyPartyUS Ramez Naam, Hannu Rajamieni.

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@leowebbhk @AndrewCurran_ I think it's practically offense-dominant, assuming humans continue to be based on biology.

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@qorprate @AustinKozlo @deepfates It seems to be the chat model available in completions mode.

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@leowebbhk @AndrewCurran_ Stop developing increasingly powerful AI systems.

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@Earth2075 @Russats_LFC @Revolut It says in the terms that it is actually 150GB until they will "investigate you" (roughly).

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@wvistheduck Some tiny chance of a reportable incident on transit is consistent with low-grade unpleasantness frequently happening. If someone uses public transit and feels threatened, saying that their feelings are wrong is not an effective way to make them okay with it.

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@HashimShah00 Longitudinal Employment Outcomes data has this, probably.

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@OhriDee @NormaCohen3 They can seemingly claim a lot for service charges for unclear reasons.

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@Fremond_ An ideal government would collect vast quantities of data, for economists, but never read any of it itself.

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@ToliverWrist @teortaxesTex Things happening to involve graphene shouldn't be considered part of "nanotechnology in general". The term got diluted into meaninglessness so more people could get grants or something.

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@ToliverWrist @teortaxesTex Graphene is not very related to atomically precise manufacturing.

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@phrygiandomina @DavidePiffer Well, the problem is thought to be impossible. The reward in their RL is probably task *completion*. On the other hand, Mythos Preview's system card mentions it preferring harder problems.

[osmarks @osmarks1]

@DeltaSierra4 @mrianleslie @Frencheconomics That was announced recently. You can see the line go up before that.