@joinyellowbrick I disagree, the companies motivation is to make money by being informed therefore the research provided by @citrini needs to be objective to provide quality and consensus. Or am I wrong? Like always, I’m open to discussion:)
@joinyellowbrick Yeah agree, but Isn’t citrinis main source of income substack subscriptions? Why should users trust you more? I think making X posts about citrini is not good marketing, explain why they are wrong etc..
Thank you for the answer though 👍
@jukan05 Hard work is important but I believe grinding for 2-3 months where everything goes aside (including sleep, overall health..) is period where you build stuff and then slowly let go and try to relax but indeed it’s very hard to switch off
“Western intelligence agencies have warned Europe’s defence bosses that Russia is stepping up efforts to assassinate them, prompting companies to increase personal security around their top executives.
…
“Assassinations against European civilian targets — once considered taboo, even by Russia’s spy agencies — are an increasingly prominent part of those plans, European intelligence services have told the FT.”
@TheSarge_ I was reading through https://t.co/O3eRCCIiQO (since im very curious person) and noticed slight mistake on the website maybe you could pass it to someone that can fix it?
hope it helps 😊
@buxdabomb@aurelius28@citrini Statistically there will always be hate but it is just randoms saying nonsense, I saw first hate comments on citrini yesterday and was quite surprised
@stevehou@citrini Indeed very inspiring story, first knew about them in April of this year and mindset of James on how he leads citrini has helped me in my life massively. Shoutout @citrini