Rob Bee

Investment management distribution, family man, U18’s cricket coach

[Rob Bee @RobBeetweets]

@JohnRentoul So much more impressive than the last few Tory leaders.

[JOHN WHITE @Ngonge69JOHN]

For Lineker to refer to The Falklands as 'Las Malvinas' is utterly disgraceful. He should never work on TV again. It's so disrespectful to those that lost their lives defending them. He knew what he was doing. Vile man.

[PeterScales @Peterscales]

@MarkDampier It’s outrageous- it’s not fairness it’s a kick in the teeth for people who had spent a lifetime working paying tax and NI along the way then vat & duties when you spend it to provide for your family - then some profligate gives it to someone else who has contributed nothing 💩

[Lee Harris @LeeHarris]

Silence from Keir Starmer.
Silence from Sadiq Khan.
Silence from Shabana Mahmood.
No COBRA meeting.
No 24 hour courts.
No fast-tracking to prison.

Nothing.

Apparently they only do that for white, working-class Brits.

It couldn't be more clear.
We live in a two-tier society.

[Paul Scully @scullyp]

When he was commenting on Nadhim Zahawi's tax affairs & Tory budgets, the left hailed @DanNeidle as a beacon of redistributive tax policy, helped by his Labour leaning. Now they consider him a shill for the rich. Maybe, whisper it quietly, he's an expert with a sense of balance?

[Rob Bee @RobBeetweets]

@DanNeidle Who’s better off though? The person in a £1m flat mortgage free, or over the road in a £2m house with £1m mortgage?? Mansion tax can’t be fair until they get round that

[Essex Patriot @Essex_Patriot]

A couple earn £50k each, and their combined take-home pay is £6,320 per month.

They have 2 kids and receive full child benefit of £2,211.60 per year.

Their neighbours also have a £100,000 household income, but all of it comes from a single salary.

Since more of this income is taxed at a higher rate, their take-home pay is over £800 less per month (£5,513).

Even though they too have 2 kids, they receive £0 child benefit because their single salary exceeds the £80k threshold

THE SYSTEM IS BROKEN 🇬🇧

[Rob Bee @RobBeetweets]

@brew56200 @BigTentThinking @MichaelAArouet Precisely, which is why wealth tax doesn’t work. The richest in society don’t have their ££ sitting in a bank account, it’s invested in businesses mainly and property which are illiquid and can’t be sold easily

[Rob Bee @RobBeetweets]

@realitybasedlaw @MichaelAArouet Why should they be equal shareholders when Laura took all the risk in setting it up? They can only be equal shareholders if they buy Laura share at a fair price, which they won’t be able to afford to do as she took the risk to set up the business

[Michael A. Arouet @MichaelAArouet]

Wealth tax explained:

1. Laura loves to cook, she risks all her life savings and opens a small restaurant: Laura‘s Kitchen

2. Laura works really hard, evenings, weekends, no vacations

3. The local community loves Laura‘s Kitchen, it’s a success, the restaurant gets larger, Laura hires 30 people from the neighborhood

4. Laura makes 1,5 Million € in profit, she pays 40% in income tax: 600,000€

5. The left „tax the rich“ party wins the elections, and introduces a wealth tax

6. Laura‘s Kitchen gets valued by the tax authorities at 25 Million €. Laura must pay 5% wealth tax: 1,25 Million €

7. The income tax of 600,000€ plus 1,25 Million € in wealth tax is more than the 1,5 Million € Laura makes

8. Laura cannot afford to pay more taxes than she makes, she closes Laura’s Kitchen

9. Laura loses her life savings despite years of hard work, 30 people lose their jobs, the state receives zero taxes

10. The local community goes to McDonalds again

11. The local left “tax the rich“ party members blame „capitalism“ for that on social media

12. Everyone gets poorer due to higher unemployment and lower tax revenues

Why is this so difficult for the left to understand?

[Rob Bee @RobBeetweets]

@ElectionMapsUK @Moreincommon_ Burnham bounce lasted a long time, he’s not even in power yet

[Rob Bee @RobBeetweets]

@FurkanGozukara He is very much not an expert !

[S @KINGY657]

Scottish “nationalist” won’t support England because we colonised them (we didn’t) but they’ll support Norway who actually did colonise them, strange bunch

[Alex Hamilton @Enviro_Technol]

Dale Vince donated £5.7 million to the Labour Party.

Then his energy companies received £123 million in taxpayer subsidies.

Were journalists camping outside his home or hounding his family?

But when it’s Nigel Farage?

The double standards couldn’t be more obvious.

[Mel Stride @MelJStride]

If you aren't working why can't you look after your own children? Why should working parents pay even higher taxes to fund free childcare for people on benefits?

Labour are not the party of work, they are the party of welfare.

[Lyndon Wood ✌️👽🙏 @Lyndonx]

36% of people in the UK pay £0 income tax

That’s around 25,000,000 people !!!

700,000 people pay 27% of income tax

7,000,000 people pay 59% of income tax

70,000,000 people in UK.

So 42% of all income tax is paid by the 1% of tax payers

89% is paid by the top 10% of tax payers

And Labour and some grifters want tax then more???

[Anglo Futurism Capital LP 🇬🇧🐿️ @RollingHedge]

But the parents who are on benefits DO NOT WORK - so they can - and I can’t stress this next bit enough - LOOK AFTER THEIR OWN KIDS?!?! Wtaf?!

If you were to do this - then surely the people who NEED 30 hrs of free child care would be families with both parents in work who are paying in more than they take out but still close to the margin and feeling the pinch.

These Labour shit-for-brains MPs are so intolerably inept.

[Lloyd @LGB_1962]

Over 900 sub-postmasters convicted, 236 jailed.

13 died by suicide, many more tried.

A £1.2 Billion compensation payout the tax payer is on the hook for.

And Ed Davey profited to the tune of £275,000

You are the one that has caused enough damage, you corrupt little bastard.

[Stuey Beef 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @stuey_beef]

HMRC has just delayed a report that says hiking Capital Gains Tax reduces tax revenue — at the exact moment Andy Burnham’s allies are floating CGT hikes. That’s not policy‑making, that’s information management.

The last HMRC bulletin (June 2025) modelled a 10‑point rise in the higher CGT rate and found it would cut receipts by £540m in year one, over £2bn in year two and £3.5bn in year three versus leaving rates alone. In other words: higher rate, smaller tax take.

They also found a smaller 5‑point hike still blows a hole in the public finances: a £235m shortfall in 2027‑28, rising to £870m the following year. So both the “big raid” and the “modest tweak” end up with less money for schools, hospitals and defence.

Now, that update to the bulletin has been “deferred” while HMRC reviews the assumptions — conveniently buying time while Burnham weighs how hard to go after investors and business owners. If the new modelling contradicted the 2025 numbers, they’d be rushing it out, not shoving it in a drawer.

This is the real story: the machinery of state is sitting on analysis that undermines the flagship tax rise being briefed to the lobby. Why would you bury evidence that your own policy loses billions, unless the politics matter more than the numbers?

If you think the public deserves to see the HMRC report before Burnham raids your pension, business sale or ISA, share this and ask one question under every Labour and Treasury post today: “Where is the CGT bulletin?”

[Alex Phillips @ThatAlexWoman]

How about you tell us about that time you were Post Office Minister during the Horizon Scandal then coined £275,000 helping the law firm representing the Post Office?

People f*cking committed suicide over it, you utter scumbag

Which is why you avoid the press by goofing around on jet skis like a giant pr1ck