Mathemagical

#ITM #TYFYC

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@BeHumbleWithGod @MrCasey62 It’s a shame that the deaths at Korah’s revolt have not given men pause before questioning God’s authority.

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@JackVinson911 @JustinWhang G is the only correct response. Louisiana creole and Cajun, Texas bbq, that line is far enough north to get decent lobster, Mexican…D might be a close second for diversity of the menu but you’re not taking my boudin and crawfish for some curry

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@DavisGilmer @MrCasey62 @Graeco_Roman I am so confused about this response. I can’t help but think this outlaw guy didn’t even read it.

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@cudchewerchad @gonefishin1948 @moresureword7 Your mistake is thinking we (Catholics) are the ones who did (do) what you are accusing us of…calling the pope a mere man (he is) and acting as if snubbing the authority of the pope isn’t snubbing the authority of Christ Himself. Korah died in vain.

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@marcado_razon @sola_chad This pic is amazing. Thank you

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@cobraalerts LFG

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@ZeroHedge_ @coreymason @Tradingalpha_ Great stuff. Huge gains. Easy to use. 💵💵💵

[Wick @ZeroHedge_]

One of our members using the Alpha Dots did a backtest on #BTC & just revealed the results.

He chose a strategy seen in the upper left corner vs traditional buy and hodl on #BTC

545x using the Dots, vs 102x buy and hodl

Thanks for sharing @coreymason !

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@NerdistExtreme @engineers_feed This is as high as I’ve gotten. 45 triangles

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@Brink_Thinker Kung Pow

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@Jobel_3C @numetal_moment Here comes the pain

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@CitizenPM @Erik_Is_Generic @ShitpostGate Kalima shak ti deh

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@ggreenwald @barnes_law ITM, TYFYC Fuck the EU

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@DefSteverinoc @marshalederman @Oliversworld24

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@TheChiefNerd @adamcurry @THErealDVORAK

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@wolfyvser GPT

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@wolfyvser GBT

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@WomenPostingLs I k l

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@BertYoung3 @MarketKangaroo @SJosephBurns This applies to 52 and 40. If you continue to move linearly from 3+6, you will get to 8+11. I think 96 is the only correct answer of these 3 (96,52,40)

[Mathemagical @seaboltcf]

@BertYoung3 @MarketKangaroo @SJosephBurns This doesn’t work for “all lines” unless you assume there are only 4 lines. But I think it’s unreasonable to assume that since the first 3 lines move linearly. 1+4, 2+5, 3+6. Then it jumps to 8+11?