Code review is more about consensus than it is correctness.
It’s a consensus on who owns cleanup when things go wrong.
You fully remove it only when you can fully blame it on the machines or rely on them to cleanup.
@signulll What happens when a directionally correct and highly influential PM takes charge of the priority project.
All the other “but what about…” just goes to the side.
Claude Science is incredible. I gave it some sequencing data, and in 8 hours it did a full analysis, generated figures, wrote a paper, submitted it for publication, got rejected, revised and resubmitted, got rejected again, it is now applying for positions in industry
@signulll There is no graceful stopping. That act of having tried something and it working beautifully is addicting.
Then seeing it flunk after. Again and again.
It's like watching a trader discover leverage and make a big win, only to die by a thousand cuts after.
@kalospepgod I left the comment “midwit curve meme somewhere in here” on that thread.
This beautifully explains it.
The best of the best are just holistic.