@starman0708499@DJSnM from his linkedin
"Software Engineer
Apple Inc · Full-time
Nov 2013 - Aug 2025 · 11 yrs 10 mos"
It was a sponsor from Mammouth AI, who bundle various models into one subscription/wrapper/app.
@theofficialjeff@egirlian@thesoypill The fact that it is still a massive debate whether vision is better than vision+LIDAR (both systems are similarly valid), suggests its not a big technical decision, it’s a big strategic decision, in which case it’s absolutely Elon’s job to make said decision
@deicivitas@Starlink@SpaceX It's really easy to track and get data of satelite locations and trajectories. It's small debris <20cm that is hard to detect, which this system can
@darin_gordon@Starlink@SpaceX collision risk is insignificant for a single satellite but significant for a constellation of 10000(since they're all in the same orbital shell, cascading kessler syndrome would be likely after some critical number of collisions
@eager_space If Falcon 9 has a marginal cost of $20m, and they charge $60m per launch (because they have no competition), then do you think New Glenn will get it's marginal cost per launch below $60m before Starship does (will blue origin ever actually be competitive on $/kg).
@genefj@KuittinenPetri@deedydas They don't need to produce a 200x better product, they just need to produce a product 20% better than their competitors. AI is all or nothing basically. (No moat, so users just switch month-by-month, to whatever company happens to have the best model)
@felpix_@deedydas If they pay 20 devs 10M/year for 5 years, and result in an AI Agent that can do the work of someone earning 50k/year (e.g. admin, finance, management), if they can replace 20,000 Jobs, they'd break even by 2030, then profit 800M/year after that (more if they continue to scale)
@KenKirtland17 The justification is new phones have more processing power so they can afford to do this. In reality it’s just that the newest iPhones have more processing power, which is under utilised by pretty much all users.
They have solution and are now inventing the problem.
@BellikOzan He does say it's a 'city on mars', not a 'martian holiday destination'. Not having to return people makes the engineering problem comparatively trivial.
(an as long as there are a couple dozen people there initially to form a society, QOL shouldn't be impacted too much)