The Attorney Grievance Committee (AGC) is giving up their mandate to the SEC’s OGC stating they are “better suited” to investigate the Bar Complaint against their own, Jorge Tenreiro, SEC Chief Litigation Counsel.
The very same Counsel that is attacking Ripple/XRP.
“The AGC’s independence is essential to ensuring accountability, particularly when the allegations involve high-ranking federal attorneys and potentially systemic misconduct. As noted in In re Rowe, 80 N.Y.2d 336 (1992), the public’s confidence in the legal profession depends on transparent and impartial disciplinary processes. Delegating oversight to the SEC, where Mr. Tenreiro remains a senior official and where the OGC has a clear institutional stake, jeopardizes this confidence and risks the appearance of protectionism.”
Nobody has ever talked about this.
Wait till you find out about the rest, things that are undercover and you can find a trace of them.
Subliminal Acoustic Manipulation of the Nervous Systems - Patent: US6017302A
https://t.co/pogdcZmarw
Nikola Tesla, a visionary whose inventions could have changed the world, faced a concerted effort by the establishment to suppress his work and maintain control over the energy and technology markets
A Thread on the tactics used by the establishment to maintain control over lucrative markets:
1/9
@freddyriz@JohnReedStark What about someone that is actually fighting back against the overreach of the SEC?
This is a reply from a community that has issued a Bar Complaint against the Chief Litigation Counsel, the very same counsel that is attacking XRP
I look forward to your support 🙏
No different than Nikola Tesla…
The establishment is vilifying inventors and stifling patented technology to pave the way for ETHgate.
Why does everyone support Debtbox but refuse to accept the SEC did the exact same thing to @ReggieMiddleton with a questionable TRO proven using documents from the SEC itself?
We have the proof!
THE FOX GUARDING THE HEN HOUSE?
Quoted from the Veri Communities reply sent to the AGC after many complainants received an email stating the AGC was delegating the investigation back to the SEC who are implicated in the complaint
“The AGC’s independence is essential to ensuring accountability, particularly when the allegations involve high-ranking federal attorneys and potentially systemic misconduct. As noted in In re Rowe, 80 N.Y.2d 336 (1992), the public’s confidence in the legal profession depends on transparent and impartial disciplinary processes. Delegating oversight to the SEC, where Mr. Tenreiro remains a senior official and where the OGC has a clear institutional stake, jeopardizes this confidence and risks the appearance of protectionism.”
THE FOX GUARDING THE HEN HOUSE?
Quoted from the Veri Communities reply sent to the AGC after many complainants received an email stating the AGC was delegating the investigation back to the SEC who are implicated in the complaint
“The AGC’s independence is essential to ensuring accountability, particularly when the allegations involve high-ranking federal attorneys and potentially systemic misconduct. As noted in In re Rowe, 80 N.Y.2d 336 (1992), the public’s confidence in the legal profession depends on transparent and impartial disciplinary processes. Delegating oversight to the SEC, where Mr. Tenreiro remains a senior official and where the OGC has a clear institutional stake, jeopardizes this confidence and risks the appearance of protectionism.”
THE FOX GUARDING THE HEN HOUSE?
Quoted from the Veri Communities reply sent to the AGC after many complainants received an email stating the AGC was delegating the investigation back to the SEC who are implicated in the complaint
“The AGC’s independence is essential to ensuring accountability, particularly when the allegations involve high-ranking federal attorneys and potentially systemic misconduct. As noted in In re Rowe, 80 N.Y.2d 336 (1992), the public’s confidence in the legal profession depends on transparent and impartial disciplinary processes. Delegating oversight to the SEC, where Mr. Tenreiro remains a senior official and where the OGC has a clear institutional stake, jeopardizes this confidence and risks the appearance of protectionism.”