Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD

I/O Psychologist & Researcher | Psychometrics + Analytics | People × Technology × Work | Making workplace decisions smarter with evidence

[Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD @GrobelnyPhd]

@rust_ruslan @ResearchHub but you've probably heard plenty of publisher-funded ones

[Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD @GrobelnyPhd]

@RetractionWatch I see this as a consequence of the "storytelling" push in research papers. Researchers are told to focus on telling a narrative, while they should focus of telling how they gathered the data and what the data says about their theory

[Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD @GrobelnyPhd]

@ross_prager Much of the hate towards using AI in academia sounds to me exactly as my teachers telling me some 20 years ago that Wikipedia is not worth using

[Richard V. Reeves @RichardvReeves]

Wait, the replication crisis is worse in economics than psychology?

[Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD @GrobelnyPhd]

@cremieuxrecueil Out of actual curiosity, is it a way to separate thesis entirely written by AI from the ones on which LLM is used for proofreading and editing?

[Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD @GrobelnyPhd]

@GolinoHudson Great work!

[Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD @GrobelnyPhd]

@nkalamb Ah, gate keeping and virtue signaling in academia at its finest 😊

[Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD @GrobelnyPhd]

@MJuzaszek Może nie powiedzieli którego?

[Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD @GrobelnyPhd]

@DrKarleenG I understand this means we now have a reliable AI detector available, with decent accuracy?

[Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD @GrobelnyPhd]

"AI cannot replace human participants in behavioral research"
https://t.co/KNhv6TVgCG

#LLM #SiliconSamples #Psychology #Metascience #SyntheticParticipants #AI

[Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD @GrobelnyPhd]

@RetractionWatch Fair for new findings, less so for replications. LLMs have absorbed the nomological networks between psychological constructs, so they may well reproduce known effects. Imho silicon-sample studies should be split along that line.

[Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD @GrobelnyPhd]

🤖 Nasz AGIBOT ma „towarzystwo”: w 1. poł. 2026 na świat powędrowało prawie 25k humanoidów, z tego 8.6k AGIBOTów.

Ok. 69% trafiło do nauki i edukacji, więc tysiące zespołów rozwija teraz te roboty i ich interakcję z ludźmi.

#HRI #robotyka
https://t.co/vND2pgChKV

[Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD @GrobelnyPhd]

I wonder, why journals can't find reviewers for my paper?

https://t.co/uAVN8dVvUB

[Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD @GrobelnyPhd]

We analyzed 40+ definitions of #sustainable careers from 93 studies and propose a model with four dimensions: health, satisfaction, productivity, and social embeddedness. The last one measures a career by what it gives back, not only by promotions. https://t.co/VUHcphoiEG

[Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD @GrobelnyPhd]

@PredatoryReport But that's still not enough for publishers to consider that maybe, just maybe, they should pay reviewers for their reviews

[Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD @GrobelnyPhd]

@NLetki Bycie naukowcem to taka sama praca jak każda inna. Należy oczywiście docenić, jeżeli ktoś chce wysłać swoje artykuły do dobrych czasopism, które są wysoko w Scopusie, ale na liście GOV im się wylosowało mało albo nic. Ale nie można oczekiwać, że to będzie codzienność

[Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD @GrobelnyPhd]

https://t.co/c57pTQh0Ii

[Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD @GrobelnyPhd]

I've joined the editorial board of Brain Theory and Intelligence Science, a new @SpringerNature journal on brain function and #intelligence, from neural information processing to behaviour, and on brain-inspired models, intelligent systems and #AI. Now open for first submissions.

[Jaroslaw Grobelny, PhD @GrobelnyPhd]

Our recent preprint is available on arXiv:
exposure to narratives of AI-over-human control raises job replacement anxiety. The more useful people found AI, the more anxious they were, but perceived ease of use played no role.
https://t.co/PtiWUServI

[UAM Poznań @UAM_Poznan]

UAM wykorzysta humanoidalnego robota w badaniach nad przyszłością pracy i relacjami człowieka z technologią: https://t.co/cv87yz0eCJ