@strat0manc3r@Griffin1each@jayplemons It might pave the way for this in the case of gross negligence situations where it should though. Making individuals personally liable and not allowed to have insurance just won’t work. No rational actor would make that change without being forced to and results in no police.
@strat0manc3r@Griffin1each@jayplemons Insurance would make them feel the pain. Because more violations will result in higher premiums which they will feel themselves regardless of if they or their friends committed the violation.
@Startupat60@levelsio@X Well, screen time says I only spend ~10 minutes a day here. Mostly just a quick scroll through my following. Not trying to spend more time on twitter. But I agree contributing to society is much better than just following along
@Startupat60@levelsio@X I totally agree. I am mostly lurking but a few times have had the desire to respond to one of his posts and couldn’t. Very annoying 😕would be cool if you could get around it like once per 24 hours so I could engage
@thehierophant96@TheWarMonitor That’s the part that’s killing me. Previous one while I strongly think it was murder too, the person really was actively hindering the agents and drove her vehicle in the vicinity of them. This one is just wrong on way more levels.
@levelsio Did you try out any of the Jet lag reduction apps/guides? I used one and it suggested a different strategy than I usually have used in the past and it helped tremendously. Most different was the caffeine and sleep timing.
@GZrespectall@DrArshadAfzal1@PeterSchiff 100$ sneakers will cost 140$ if made in USA if they can be produced cheaper than abroad w/ tariffs, plus sales taxes on that will increase prices to 110$ and 154$ each. Of course sneakers are generally more expensive than 100$ already. Worst part is this extra is gov. taxes… 🤮
@Scientific_Bird@twittingcos@dgrcode@dhh@RickStrahl I read your article, very interesting data! One thing I’m wondering is if the data shows you how long they have been in Denmark? Would be interesting to see if crime rates change as immigrants have been in Denmark longer.
@twittingcos@dgrcode@dhh@RickStrahl You’re probably right and that would make sense. it’s very strange wording given conviction rate refers to something specific. Wish this chart had more clarity, on the surface it appears intentionally misleading though it confirms my bias of poor people are likely to commit crime
@dhh@RickStrahl This doesn’t make much sense unless conviction rate means something different or conviction rates are very low(which would be bad?). Say danish conviction rate is 33%, 3x is 99% so that would mean 2/3s of trials for violent crime don’t end in conviction for Danes?