MercedesLopezArratia

Estoy convencida de que el empoderamiento de las mujeres debe pasar por su autonomía financiera, emocional , sexual y de propósito.

[cami | TDWP2.👠 @andreahsachs]

reminding you that, during the covid-19 pandemic, i was hopeless in life and, suddenly, meryl streep, christine baranski, and audra mcdonald got together and performed the song 'the ladies who lunch'. who can survive without art, my god! incredible women!

[Raytar @Raytar]

Met a guy making $1.6 million a year.

Three days ago he was at a Meta conference. Told me he saw the best AI talk of his life.

Boris Cherny was on stage. Showed how the Anthropic team actually uses Claude day to day.

Boris deleted his IDE eight months ago. Now he codes from his phone.

I watched it last night. Had to pause it twice.

Not because it was hard. Because I realized I've been using Claude like a toy.

He sent me the recording. It was never published.

Posting it below.

[Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D. @hubermanlab]

Envy and resent act as a dominant negatives on your ability to be inspired. Protect that ability at all costs.

[Dan Go @CoachDanGo]

Walking is the most underrated way to burn fat, and the best part about it is its low intensity and high accessibility.

Try one of these out, see how it works, and congrats, you've just upgraded your walk.

Follow me @CoachDanGo for more.

[MercedesLopezArratia @LopezArratia]

@Codie_Sanchez SMB

[Codie Sanchez @Codie_Sanchez]

How plumbers sleep during the AI revolution…

[Jesse Michels @AlchemyAmerican]

🚨BREAKING: A cognitive scientist from MIT has mathematically proven that evolution guarantees we see zero percent of true reality, that most consciousness in the universe exists without a body, and that non-human intelligences with a wider window on reality than ours can reach in and manipulate it the way a programmer manipulates a video game.

Donald Hoffman (@donalddhoffman) is a cognitive scientist at UC Irvine who has spent 40 years building a mathematical theory of the observer. His work was cited by John Wheeler in the "It From Bit" paper. He studied under Marvin Minsky at MIT, spent two decades secretly meeting with Francis Crick to study consciousness, and has nine specific mathematical conjectures on the table that would derive general relativity, quantum field theory and the Big Bang from a single framework. The top high-energy physicists in the world, Nima Arkani-Hamed and Nobel laureate David Gross, are already saying spacetime is doomed. Hoffman thinks he knows what replaces it.

This interview is the first time he has publicly laid out what his mathematical model explains about alien life, embodiment and the structure of reality.

It already derives time dilation and quantum wave functions directly from differences in observer window size. Physics has spent a century failing to solve the measurement problem because it has been looking in the wrong place. The observer has to come first, and no physicalist framework can get you there.

A consciousness with a larger observer window has access to the underlying structure of our reality in ways we can't perceive or counter. A craft going Mach 40 instantaneously in our headset could be a leisurely maneuver in theirs.

The implications for UAP and alien life are immense.
Embodiment, being locked into a body with fingers and toes as your only interface with the world, is a probability zero anomaly in the full space of possible minds. He also says current large language models are dumber than cucumbers. His new framework, the recursive trace logic, is a completely different architecture, and some of the biggest names in frontier AI have already come to him about it.

The framework has no ceiling, and the implication is a single unified consciousness exploring itself through an unbounded number of perspectives, each one capable of waking up.

Death, in this framework, is just the closing of an icon on the desktop.

Full conversation is live now.

[LongevityLab @LxngevityLab]

I've spent thousands of hours watching all 835 episodes of The Diary Of A CEO podcast.

Here are the 10 craziest health lessons I learned (so you can skip the 1000+ hours):

1. Weekly sex extends your life by 49%:

[LongevityLab @LxngevityLab]

And before you scroll…

If you got value from this thread, follow @LxngevityLab and retweet the first post.

See you in the next one!

[Prof. Dr. Kaan Yılancıoğlu @drkaanyl]

Şu egzersiz lenfatik drenajı, tüm vücutta kan akımını arttıran, neredeyse tüm vücudu çalıştıran belki de dünyanın en iyi egzersizi ... 👇

[Matthew LaBosco @matthew_labosco]

Robert Sapolsky is a Stanford neuroscientist who proved chronic stress is the silent killer doctors ignore.

On Chris Williamson's podcast, he revealed 10 "normal" habits you do every day that wreck your sleep, mood, and nervous system:

1) Replay conversations in your head

[Movez @0xMovez]

This 30-min workshop by the creator of Claude Code will teach you more about vibe-coding than 100 YouTube video guides.

Bookmark it & give it 30 minutes today. This video will change the way you use Claude forever.

[Nav Toor @heynavtoor]

Claude can now meal prep your entire week and hit your exact nutrition goals like a $200/hour registered dietitian from the Mayo Clinic. For free.

Here are 12 prompts that plan meals, calculate macros, and save you $500/month on groceries:

(Save this before it disappears)

[Evan Luthra @EvanLuthra]

Anthropic pays engineers $750,000+ a year to understand how LLMs work.

Stanford just put a 2 hour lecture that covers 80% of it for FREE.

Bookmark this. Give it 2 hours today.

It might be the highest ROI thing you do this month:

[Neyazuddin Ansari @riyazz_ai]

Finding 5 — Meditation changes brain density in 8 weeks.

Harvard neuroscientist Sara Lazar showed:

8 weeks of daily meditation increases gray matter in regions controlling:
→ Self-awareness
→ Compassion
→ Emotional regulation

And DECREASES gray matter in:
→ The amygdala (fear center)

You are literally building a less fearful, more aware brain with meditation.

[Jaynit @jaynitx]

In the 1920s, a Stanford psychologist tracked genius children for 50 years.

Malcolm Gladwell breaks down what he discovered:

Rich families → successful. Poor families → failures.

Not average. Failures. Genius-level IQs that produced nothing.

He spent 60 minutes at Microsoft explaining why we're wrong about success:

The psychologist was named Terman. He gave IQ tests to 250,000 California schoolchildren.

He identified the top 0.1%. Kids with IQs of 140 and above.

His hypothesis: these children would become the leaders of academia, industry, and politics.

He tracked them. And tracked them. For decades.

The results split into three groups.

The top 15% achieved real prominence. The middle group had average, moderately successful professional lives.

And the bottom group? By any measure, failures.

The difference wasn't personality. Wasn't habits. Wasn't work ethic.

It was simple: the successful geniuses came from wealthy households. The failures came from poor families.

Poverty is such a powerful constraint that it can reduce a one-in-a-billion brain to a lifetime of worse than mediocrity.

There's a concept called "capitalization rate."

It asks a simple question: what percentage of people who are capable of doing something actually end up doing that thing?

In inner city Memphis, only 1 in 6 kids with athletic scholarships actually go to college.

If our capitalization rate for sports in the inner city is 16%, imagine how low it must be for everything else.

Here's something stranger.

Gladwell read the birth dates of the 2007 Czech Junior Hockey Team:

January 3rd. January 3rd. January 12th. February 8th. February 10th. February 17th. February 20th. February 24th. March 5th. March 10th. March 26th...

11 of the 20 players were born in January, February, or March.

This isn't unique to the Czechs. Every elite hockey team in the world shows the same pattern. Every elite soccer team too.

Why?

The eligibility cutoff for youth leagues is January 1st.

When you're 10 years old, a kid born in January has 10 months of maturity on a kid born in October. That's 3 or 4 inches of height. The difference between clumsy and coordinated.

So we look at a group of 10 year olds, pick the "best" ones, give them special coaching, extra practice, more games.

We think we're identifying talent. We're just identifying the oldest.

Then we give the oldest more opportunities, and 10 years later they really are the best.

Self-fulfilling prophecy.

The capitalization rate for hockey talent born in the second half of the year? Close to zero.

We're leaving half of all potential hockey players on the table because of an arbitrary date on a calendar.

Kids born in the youngest cohort of their school class are 11% less likely to go to college.

11% of human potential squandered because we organize elementary school without reference to biological maturity.

Now here's the part about math.

Asian kids dramatically outperform Western kids in mathematics. The gap is enormous and consistent across decades of testing.

Some people say it's genetic. It's not.

It's attitudinal.

When Asian kids face a math problem, they believe effort will solve it.

When Western kids face a math problem, they believe the answer depends on innate ability they either have or don't.

Here's the proof.

The international math tests include a 120-question survey. It asks about study habits, parental support, attitudes.

It's so long most kids don't finish it.

A researcher named Erling Boe decided to rank countries by what percentage of survey questions their kids completed.

Then he compared it to the ranking of countries by math performance.

The correlation was 0.98.

In the history of social science, there has never been a correlation that high.

If you want to know how good a country is at math, you don't need to ask any math questions. Just make kids sit down and focus on a task for an extended period of time.

If they can do it, they're good at math.

Why do Asian cultures have this attitude?

Gladwell's theory: rice farming.

His European ancestors in medieval England worked about 1,000 hours a year. Dawn to noon, five days a week. Winters off. Lots of holidays.

A peasant in South China or Japan in the same period worked 3,000 hours a year.

Rice farming isn't just harder than wheat farming. It's a completely different relationship with work.

There's a Chinese proverb: "A man who works dawn to dusk 360 days a year will not go hungry."

His English ancestors would have said: "A man who works 175 days a year, dawn to 11, may or may not be hungry."

If your culture does that for a thousand years, it becomes part of your makeup.

When your kids sit down to face a calculus problem, that legacy of persistence translates perfectly.

Now consider distance running.

In Kenya, there are roughly a million schoolboys between 10 and 17 running 10 to 12 miles a day.

In the United States, that number is probably 5,000.

Our capitalization rate for distance running is less than 1%.

Kenya's is probably 95%.

The difference isn't genetic. The difference is what the culture values and where it spends its attention.

Here's the most fascinating finding.

30% of American entrepreneurs have been diagnosed with a profound learning disability.

Richard Branson is dyslexic. Charles Schwab is dyslexic. John Chambers can barely read his own email.

This isn't coincidence. Their entrepreneurialism is a direct function of their disability.

How do you succeed if you can't read or write from early childhood?

You learn to delegate. You become a great oral communicator. You become a problem solver because your entire life is one big problem. You learn to lead.

80% of dyslexic entrepreneurs were captain of a high school sports team. Versus 30% of non-dyslexic entrepreneurs.

By the time they enter the real world, they've spent their whole life practicing the four skills at the core of entrepreneurial success: delegation, oral communication, problem solving, and leadership.

Ask them what role dyslexia played in their success and they don't say it was an obstacle.

They say it's the reason they succeeded.

A disadvantage that became an advantage.

Here's what Gladwell wants you to understand:

When we see differences in success, our default explanation is differences in ability.

We forget how much poverty, stupidity, and attitude constrain what people can become.

We refuse to admit that our own arbitrary rules are leaving talent on the table.

We cling to naive beliefs that our meritocracies are fair.

The capitalization argument is liberating.

It says you don't look at a struggling group and conclude they're incapable. It says problems that look genetic or innate are often just failures of exploitation.

It says we can make a profound difference in how well people turn out.

If we choose to pay attention.

This 60 minute Microsoft talk will teach you more about success than every self-help book you've ever read combined.

Bookmark this & give it an hour today, no matter what.

[Goku @ProjectGokuu]

Dr. Rhonda Patrick just dropped a 3-hour masterclass on the Huberman Lab podcast.

She shared 8 shocking insights about everyday things that are slowly making you sick:

1) Drinking water from glass bottles (has higher levels of microplastics than in plastic ones)

[Allen Braden @allen_explains]

Every salary you accepted, every price you agreed to, every negotiation you walked out of thinking you did okay
The person across the table wasn't guessing. They were calculating.

You were improvising. They were running a system.

That system has a name: Game Theory.

And one Yale professor named Ben Polak taught an entire course on it. The same frameworks that get drilled into students paying $150k for an MBA — laid out clean, in one hour, completely free.

After watching it you'll never sit across from someone in a negotiation the same way again. You'll start seeing the hidden logic behind why people make the moves they make — in business, in hiring, in pricing, in everyday decisions most people treat as instinct.

This is the kind of thinking that separates people who react from people who position themselves three moves ahead.

Yale put it online for anyone willing to spend 60 minutes on it.

That's the most asymmetric trade you'll make all week.

[Robert ₿reedlove @Breedlove22]

I interviewed one of the most controversial MDs on the internet @paulsaladinomd

He exposed the 9 biggest lies the health industry sold you and every single one is making you fatter, weaker & sicker (THREAD)

Lie #1: "Sunscreen prevents cancer''

[Roan @RohOnChain]

This 2 hour Stanford lecture shows exactly how Stanford trains it's engineers to build AI systems. It's more practical than every Claude tutorial & prompting threads you've seen.

Bookmark & give it 2 hours, no matter what. It'll be the most productive thing you do this weekend.