@homemadehooplah@Masashi_Limba Our motto at Recognyze AI is "don't sue them, charge them". Lawsuits take years, are costly, and may not succeed. The better way is to register content at https://t.co/JOmlQ6dh94 and get the proceeds from LLM usage.
@ioangrillo@BitBullish There is an alternative. Replace theft by honest contribution. LLMs and other AI tools should pay for what they use. At Recognyze AI we have built the needed technology. If you have content on the Web, protect it, and gain from it, by registering it at https://t.co/JOmlQ6dh94
@GaryMarcus@SenSanders Protesting theft makes headlines but does not help content creators whose work is packaged and resold by AI companies. At Recognyze AI we offer a more pragmatic approach: don't sue them, charge them. If you have content, please consider registering it at https://t.co/JOmlQ6dOYC.
@allenanalysis Suing is one way. At Recognyze AI we take the business view: make AI companies pay a -- reasonable and sustainable -- fee for the material they use. If you have such material, please consider registering it at https://t.co/JOmlQ6dOYC.
@Ric_RTP Very apposite analysis. Recognyze AI tackles this problem head-on with a business model where everyone benefits: LLMs pay a reasonable fee for access, giving Web developers an incentive to continue developing their sites. The recipe for a sustainable Web. https://t.co/JOmlQ6dh94
@RobertFreundLaw At @Recognyze_AI we want to avoid exactly that kind of situation by providing a simple and fair way to charge LLMs for use of Web content. Check us out at https://t.co/JOmlQ6dh94.
@glenngabe Check out @Recognyze_AI. We have the technology to track AI companies' usage of Web content, and charge them for it. A win-win for both parties. Charging is better than suing. See https://t.co/JOmlQ6dh94. Signing up is free and easy.
@mediagazer@blakebrittain Use of Web material does not need to be bad. After all, everyone benefits from quality LLM answers. Content creators can sue and wait for years to see the result. We at @Recognyze_AI offer a different solution: with our technology, track AI tools and charge them for use.
@koltregaskes Suing is one way, but it is more productive to everyone if we simply charge LLMs for their use of our content. That's what we do at @Recognyze_AI . Our technology tracks access and charges LLM. Check us out! https://t.co/JOmlQ6dh94.
@LuizaJarovsky@susanorlean Check out @Recognyze_AI and its technology to track and charge AI aggregators. We believe that charging is better than suing. https://t.co/JOmlQ6dh94.
@ecutruin@jvelilla@cybercpu@ImKingGinger Enforcing is through two mechanisms. First it is in LLMs' interest to sustain a quality Web. Second, if they refuse to comply, they simply lose access to the sites. A simple and fair business process.
@ecutruin@jvelilla@cybercpu@ImKingGinger "Fair use" is of course important but limited. It does not cover the looting of the Web by LLMs, on an unprecedented scale. (If it did, there would not be multibillion lawsuits in progress!) Recognyze addresses the problem not through suing but through a normal business process.
@LuizaJarovsky@niloofar_mire@irisiris_l@TuhinChakr Very useful analysis, thanks. Also look up the technology developed by @Recognyze_AI, https://t.co/JOmlQ6dh94, based on the "don't sue them, charge them!" principle -- monetize LLM access to Web content in a simple and fair way.