Adadeniz

Yazar Bilimsel Gerçekçi

[Tony Sobrado @TonySobrado]

More relevant now than ever... where philosophy meets neuroscience!

What Creates Consciousness? | World Science Festival https://t.co/BZEWAHz3fH via @YouTube

[Adadeniz @Adadeniz1990]

@ExploreCosmos_ @ESA_Euclid I wish you a speedy recovery.

[Adadeniz @Adadeniz1990]

@Seekersmindtalk @DanielWhiteson Many thanks @DanielWhiteson.

[Seekers Mindtalks Podcast @Seekersmindtalk]

What if the boundaries between things don't actually exist—and we've invented them?
Even numbers might not be fundamental to reality.
I explored these questions with CERN particle physicist @DanielWhiteson on Seekers Mindtalks.

🎙️ Full episode:
https://t.co/UdlOKN57wU

[Adadeniz @Adadeniz1990]

@LKrauss1 @OriginsProject Thanks for the physics lessons.

Are there four spatial dimensions in Minkowski space? If so, is there no time dimension? Perhaps I misunderstood.

[David Vanegas @evolanguagemind]

New talk by @StanDehaene about the leading theory of consciousness, the Global Neuronal Workspace Theory!

https://t.co/t8kOIlhrDy

[Anil Seth @anilkseth]

Three reasons why AI is extremely unlikely to be conscious - and why this matters. Joint opinion in @nature with Giulio Tononi and Ned Block @De_dicto

[Lawrence M. Krauss @LKrauss1]

Spacetime Unified: Lect. 6 in @OriginsProject Physics for Everyone podcast premieres 10/19 9:30 am PDT. The unification of E&M, combined with the Galileo's insights, led inevitably to a totally new view of space & time. Not as it is usually taught. https://t.co/nld37gr4xx

[Adadeniz @Adadeniz1990]

@michaelshermer Thanks for this enlightening interview, Michael Shermer.

[Michael Shermer @michaelshermer]

Why consciousness needs a body (with emotions). The great neuroscientist Antonio Damasio outlines his theory to explain the hard problem of consciousness.
https://t.co/HWX9Dwpkyc

[Jim Al-Khalili @jimalkhalili]

We’ve just posted a new Unbaffled video for you to get stuck into: https://t.co/UWNCCEhRcl

This one's a deep dive into the discovery of quarks and gluons.

It’s really gratifying that having only posted it last night it’s already had 100k views. Thank you.

[Adadeniz @Adadeniz1990]

@ValerioCapraro A wonderful explanation! Thank you so much, Capraro.

[Earl K. Miller @MillerLabMIT]

This paper changed my life: A first glimpse into the ‘middle’ of brain processing
https://t.co/VwGDl9UegE
#neuroscience

[Anna Ciaunica PhD @annaciaunica.bsky.social @AnnaCiaunica]

New essai out in @Montreal_Review

I discuss why consciousness is not a thing but rather a journey that living systems do (but not Al)

Check it out 🙏😎👇🏼

Thank you for having me !

https://t.co/d9H4rfZvFs

@SarahTheHaider @dioscuri @jeffrsebo @carlorovelli @blaiseaguera @Plinz @MelMitchell1 @emilymbender @GaryMarcus @mustafasuleyman @JasonSilva @TEDchris @sapinker @michaelpollan @MatthiasMichel_ @skdh @pgodfreysmith @mmitchell_ai @michaelshermer @fchollet @camhberg @davetroy @demishassabis @azeem

[Adadeniz @Adadeniz1990]

@martinmbauer Given that there are only three spatial dimensions, does this mean that theories predicting a greater number of dimensions are incorrect?

[Anil Seth @anilkseth]

🎇 Good news! 🎇 The kind people at @BBSJournal have made the new collection on "Conscious AI and biological naturalism" completely #OpenAccess for a limited period. This include the target article, all 50 commentaries (many of which disagree with me), and my response. Go to the link and click 'save pdf': https://t.co/6ZFzHrUsUR

For easier ways into the debate, try my @NoemaMag essay on "The Mythology of Conscious AI" (winner of the 2025 @berggruenInst Essay Prize), and this 2026 main-stage @TEDTalks:

https://t.co/LmSiQnT9Wh

https://t.co/vDvw82ookk

[Quanta Magazine @QuantaMagazine]

A few years ago, we released a special issue titled “The Unraveling of Space-Time.” We cover black holes, holograms, “alien algebra,” “pregeometry,” and newly discovered “paleophysics” that could replace our usual picture of particles moving and interacting in space-time. Explore the series here: https://t.co/e9orVm23i8

[Adadeniz @Adadeniz1990]

@LKrauss1 I am eagerly awaiting your new book.

[Phil Hoyeck @PAHoyeck]

“I think that Darwin’s ideas undo many of the biggest problems in philosophy. So many philosophers keep hammering away trying to find the essence of this or that when Darwin has shown us that nothing of any interest has an essence. It’s gradualism all the way.”

—Daniel Dennett

[Institute of Art and Ideas @IAI_TV]

'Nothing' is an absence so absolute that even defining it becomes problematic.

We might imagine ‘nothing’ as the void, the empty vacuum of space, but in contemporary physics 'nothing' is nowhere to be found. In quantum field theory, even the vacuum of space is teeming with quantum fluctuations, and in general relativity, empty space still retains a minimum energy.

But to be true nothingness, our possible candidate would need to lack time, space, matter, energy, and relation to the rest of the universe.

Should we conclude that 'nothing' is an impossibility, and if so, that 'something' is inevitable? Or can we uncover the true nature of nothing, and with it, other mysteries of the universe as well?

Pioneering theoretical physicists David Deutsch and Lee Smolin, celebrated science writer Amanda Gefter debate. Tap here to watch now. https://t.co/lY5Iuh7Ogr