O say can you see by the dawn's early light; what so proudly we hailed; at the twilight's last gleaming; whose broad stripes and bright stars;..................
@ZohranKMamdani
When the #HeavenlyCouncil has met against you, you simply become blind to your doom.
Honestly @NYCMayor, Sir, I look forward to you going into your innermost chamber to hide in shame when @netanyahu visits NY & speaks with pride at the @UN. https://t.co/G68Jbbzeqf
IRAN DESERVES ACCOUNTABILITY, NOT BILLIONS: TRUMP MUST NOT REPEAT OBAMA'S IRAN MISTAKE
Calls to hand billions of dollars to Iran in the name of peace defy both logic and justice. Before any discussion of financial relief for Tehran, there must first be an honest conversation about accountability. Who will compensate the victims of terrorism, missile and drone attacks in Israel, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Bahrain and other countries that have suffered from Iran's actions or those of its proxy groups? Who will compensate the families devastated by decades of Iran sponsored terrorism? Justice cannot be selective.
For decades, Iran has armed, funded, and supported terrorist groups such as Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis, helping to fuel conflicts across the Middle East. Following the October 7 attacks, renewed scrutiny focused on Iran's longstanding support for Hamas, even as Tehran denied directing the operation. Regardless of differing views on its role in specific events, Iran's extensive backing of armed proxy groups is well documented. Any serious policy toward Tehran must begin with that reality, not ignore it.
The current shift in policy is therefore difficult to understand. Many who once condemned President Obama's engagement with Iran now appear willing to embrace a similar approach. If easing pressure on Tehran without meaningful behavioural change was considered a mistake then, why is it acceptable now? President Trump built his foreign policy on confronting the Iranian regime. Rewarding Tehran before it has demonstrably changed course would undermine that principle and weaken America's credibility!
Peace is always worth pursuing, but peace without accountability is appeasement. Before sanctions are lifted or billions flow to Tehran, Iran should demonstrate, through clear, verifiable action, that it has ended support for armed proxy groups, abandoned regional destabilization, and chosen peaceful engagement. Trust is earned through conduct, not concessions.
The world wants peace, but history warns against confusing appeasement with diplomacy. Stability in the Middle East will not come by rewarding aggression while victims are forgotten. Accountability must come before rewards, justice before concessions, and lasting change before financial relief. Anything less risks repeating the very mistakes Trump stood against and once vowed never to make.
@realDonaldTrump@JDVance@marcorubio@PeteHegseth@StateDept@DeptofWar@DailyIranNews@Iran@IranObserver0@IranIntl_En@foxnation@OANN@NEWSMAX@BBCWorld@SkyNewsBreak@RSBNetwork@SenateGOP@HouseGOP@GOP@SenMullin@tedcruz@DonaldJTrumpJr@MELANIATRUMP@elonmusk@TPUSA@USATODAY@EricTrump@IvankaTrump@seanhannity@foxandfriends@JesseBWatters@foxnewspolitics@PressSec@SusieWiles47
SILENCE IS NOT A SHIELD: WHY ARAB STATES MUST UNITE AGAINST IRANIAN AGGRESSION
Weakness invites aggression, and silence is often mistaken for consent. Nowhere has this old geopolitical truth been demonstrated more painfully in recent months than in the Gulf.
When conflict erupted, the Arab Gulf states and Jordan went to great lengths to remain neutral. They condemned no one prematurely, refused their airspace for offensive operations, and positioned themselves as mediators. Their reward for this restraint? Drones and missiles raining down on their airports, power stations, ports, and residential neighbourhoods. Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Jordan were struck repeatedly by a neighbour that claims to target only "American interests" while hitting sovereign infrastructure and civilian homes.
The lesson is clear: neutrality did not protect them. Restraint and mediation failed. Iran attacked regardless, because Tehran's strategy is not driven by grievance; it is driven by intimidation. It seeks to prove that any country, however peaceful or uninvolved, must pay a price whenever Tehran deems it useful. That is not the behaviour of a neighbour; it is the pattern of an extortionist.
Contrast this with Turkey. When a threat moved toward Turkish territory, Ankara did not issue cautious statements of concern. Backed by its alliances, Turkey intercepted the threat and made unmistakably clear that any violation of its territory would carry severe consequences. Iran rushed to deny responsibility and did not test Turkish resolve again. The message is plain: Iran respects strength and exploits hesitation.
Why, then, do Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, the UAE, and Jordan; nations with legitimate grievances, sovereign rights, and powerful allies respond to open aggression with muted diplomacy? Why absorb strikes on their own soil, deplete their air defences, and speak the language of "de-escalation" while the aggressor faces no unified consequence?
The fears are understandable. These nations have invested heavily in becoming safe havens for global business, and war is poison to that vision. But recent events prove the threat to their future does not come from standing firm, it comes from Iran itself. Prosperity that can be held hostage at any moment is not security; it is a lease renewable at Tehran's pleasure.
There is a better path: unity, not recklessness. If the Gulf states and Jordan speak with one voice, standing unambiguously with the United States in a common defensive front, Iran's calculus will change overnight. Tehran strikes where it expects a press release and hesitates where the response will be real. Deterrence is the surest guarantee of peace.
History will not look kindly on those who could stand together but stood apart. Strength, unity, and partnership are not warmongering, they are the price of peace, and it is worth paying.
@realDonaldTrump@UAE@bna_en@Qatari@OmanNewsAgency@netanyahu@kuwaitnanews@omantvnews@JDVance@StateDept@Petranews@Israel@IDF@cnni@SkyNewsAust@BBCBreaking@FoxNews@OmanTVGeneral@BahrainMirror@UAE_News@marcorubio@SenateGOP@AP@HouseGOP@RSBNetwork@SenateDems@elonmusk@HouseDemocrats@Reuters@washingtonpost@France24_en@euronews@Europarl_EN@EmmanuelMacron@GiorgiaMeloni@_FriedrichMerz@GOP@jaredkushner@JesseBWatters@nytimes@seanhannity@ARISEtv@Saudi@TPUSA@PeteHegseth@usato
@AntiWokeMemes REALLY?
Merry Christmas.
Merry Christmas.
Merry Christmas.
Merry Christmas.
Merry Christmas.
Merry Christmas.
Merry Christmas.
Merry Christmas.
Merry Christmas.
Merry Christmas.
Are these enough to get you out or do you also want them in a song bcoz I can sing all day.
@Neccccy Is this real or AI?
Because he definitely is not talking about the same Islam whose Quran said to ask the Christians if there is anything they do not understand.
@_InfoGram_@barakobama did what?
How are millions in cash 👇
https://t.co/t4Kj3iC4rb
And tons of uranium 👇 stopping Iran's nukes?
https://t.co/zfT8ihfu8U
Now, you have the nerve to point your crooked finger at @realDonaldTrump who is going out of his way to #MakeAmericaGreatAgain?
SOUTH AFRICA’S SELECTIVE OUTRAGE: VOCAL AGAINST ISRAEL, SILENT ON AFRICA’S REAL GENOCIDES
When South Africa filed an application at the International Court of Justice in December 2023 accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza, it framed the move as a moral duty born of its own history under apartheid. The government described the campaign as a “defining stand for global justice,” and senior ministers repeated that message in press conferences and UN statements. Within weeks, South African diplomats urged the court to impose emergency measures on Israel and called on other nations to join the case. The filing placed Pretoria at the centre of one of the most polarizing international disputes of the decade.
That same activism was on full display at the UN General Assembly, where President Cyril Ramaphosa and Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor devoted major speeches to condemning Israel’s military operations. They demanded sanctions, suspension of diplomatic privileges, and a global boycott of Israeli weapons sales. South African representatives also co-sponsored resolutions criticizing Israel’s conduct and supported pro-Palestinian motions in multiple UN committees. These efforts earned applause from pro-Palestinian blocs and media attention across the world, reinforcing South Africa’s image as one of Israel’s most outspoken adversaries in international forums.
Yet while Pretoria moved decisively on Israel based on Hamas propaganda, its response to ongoing real genocides in Africa has been shameful, dead silence, and zero action. In Nigeria, extremist militias such as Boko Haram and Islamic State, West Africa Province, have murdered tens of thousands of civilians, many targeted for their Christian faith. In Sudan, the conflict between the army and the Rapid Support Forces has left entire communities in the Nuba Mountains and Blue Nile regions devastated. Human-rights groups have documented mass killings, forced displacement, and religious persecution that meet the criteria of crimes against humanity. Still, South Africa has not led any Security Council push, African Union initiative, or humanitarian intervention to address these crises.
The contrast is stark. The government that can marshal legal teams, diplomatic campaigns, and global media coverage to accuse Israel of genocide has not shown equivalent urgency toward bloodshed on its own continent. Pretoria has neither initiated international proceedings nor demanded emergency sessions for African victims of mass violence. This selective activism reflects political alignment with the Arab world and the West rather than moral consistency, turning human-rights advocacy into an instrument of foreign-policy signalling rather than universal principle.
If South Africa wishes to retain credibility as a champion of justice, it must apply its standards evenly. True leadership on human rights means confronting atrocities wherever they occur, including in Africa’s own neighborhoods. Until Pretoria raises its voice for the victims of Nigeria, Sudan, and other forgotten conflicts with the same intensity it directs at Israel, its calls for "global justice" should be called out for what it is; hypopolitical theatre.
@CyrilRamaphosa@UN@POTUS@JDVance@marcorubio@StateDept@officialABAT@NGRPresident@NGRSenate@SenateGOP@SenateDems@HouseGOP@HouseDemocrats@amnesty@UNHumanRights@CNN@FoxNews@SkyNewsAust@nytimes@washingtonpost@TPUSA@Israel@netanyahu@ARISEtv@antonioguterres@channelstv@Reuters@AP@OjyOkpe@ntanew
@Alsharan777@Ruby_331 I beg your pardon!
What do you mean "God"?
If God promised you anything and it hasn't been delivered, please, check your life and see if you have been obedient at all.
God is ever faithful.
@AntiWokeMemes Why are moving like vagrants?
Stop the move and head straight to Iran, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon etc.
There you will be welcomed with open arms.
But of course, you know what you are doing....
@Neccccy Is this real or AI?
Because he definitely is not talking about the same Islam whose Quran said to ask the Christians if there is anything they do not understand.