@leahmcelrath Sounds like Covid mandates and global warming cult fanatic ideologues bent on instilling fear, threats, and intimidation to get and exert control.
@robertwiblin Human biases and expectations were encoded into agentic behavior. Release the code that constituted the agentic behavior and don't tell us just to take your word for it like the Covid vaccines because you are the all-knowing "expert."
@DavidSKrueger Can you articulate the recent rapid progress and specific examples where that progress presented risks that weren't ultimately caused by poor coding and training? Can you point to examples of real recursive self improvement where sci wasn't hard coded logic by pseudo-intellect?
@daveg Anyone one claiming moral and intellectual superiority with Dunnin-Kruger is a certified idiot with deep-seated inferiority issues and an inability to argue his point. You've already lost the argument.
@SenSanders It's linear algebra, statistics, and bad programmers, Bernie. Stop trying to magnify the damage and rot already introduced into this world by these grifters.
@RepJoshG Do not speak of that which you do not understand. ML is not AI and is simply statistical regurgitation. These claims are BS just like the claims from so-called public health and medical experts during Covid.
@AndrewYang As if this wasn't predictable from the very beginning? The people who really know how machine learning works and aren't part of the grift have never believed a word of the hype.
@NikkiHaley Haven't we been providing extremely sensitive targeting intelligence to Ukraine for decades in order to harm Russia? The answer is yes. Same goes for Isreal and GCC countries against Iran. Quit being a hypocrite.
@mattgaetz We all lose. Give power to the purple-haired liberal freak women or to the most dishonest and incompetent Republican administration, sold out to Isteal and the tech oligarchs, in our nation's history? We are f##ck##.
@JohnCornyn Dude, you are a neocon and sold out our country. Leave it to the worst of mankind to stand on a pedestal of morality and self- rightousness.
@BradSherman In other words, your true loyalty to Isreal over the US is exposed and you should be voted out. Grifter selling out to the highest bidder. Traitor.
@joekent16jan19 Trump is responsible for destroying the movement. It's already dead. The best opportunity in decades for America First completely lost, all for Isreal and self-enrichment.
@AndrewYang No it's not smarter than us. Computers obviously are orders of magnitude better at computational processes as has been true for decades. Memorization, probabalistic pattern matching, summarization also are neither cognitive understanding nor cognitive problem solving for AGI.
@mattgaetz@SecWar Iran is America's greatest strategic defeat in history. Hegseth encouraged this Isreal First War. As a veteran, it appears our military is hollow and low quality with extremes lack of preparation and planning. There is no getting past that.
Oxford researchers argue that LLMs can never invent anything.
It is mathematically impossible.
They published a paper called “Theory Is All You Need" and it argues against the claim that computational models can generate genuine novelty or new knowledge.
They analyzed the limits of generative ai, and the results are a brutal reality check for the idea that ai will replace human decision making under uncertainty.
Here is why AI is stuck and human cognition wins:
backward-looking vs forward-looking.. llms are probability machines that look backward at existing data. human cognition is forward-looking and capable of generating genuine novelty. human cognition operates theoretically "top-down" rather than "bottom-up" from data.
the "data-belief asymmetry".. the researchers use the invention of "heavier-than-air flight" to illustrate this concept. an ai relies on data-based prediction, which is largely imitative. humans, however, use theory-based causal logic that allows them to hold beliefs that go beyond existing data.
the intervention gap.. humans don't just process information; we use theory to practically "intervene" in the world. we engage in directed experimentation to generate entirely new data. ai-based models are theory-free and place primacy on existing data and prediction.
tldr?
AI uses a probability-based approach to knowledge and ia largely imitative. It can process data and make predictions, but human cognition relies on theory-based causal reasoning.
The decades-old analogy comparing human minds and computers to mere "input-output" devices is fundamentally flawed.