The Math Man

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@mdwstfishingmo @AshleyBillam @Perrid13 @ASFleischman @TheModerateCase Here’s a screenshot so you can read it for yourself.

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@mdwstfishingmo @AshleyBillam @Perrid13 @ASFleischman @TheModerateCase Be honest. Have you read Elk v. Wilkins? Because it does exactly what you’re saying it doesn’t.

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@mdwstfishingmo @Perrid13 @ASFleischman @TheModerateCase Right, because tribes are their own sovereigns, and therefore outside the jurisdiction of the US. I think everyone agrees that natives and children of diplomats are two clear exceptions to the Constitutional rule.

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@ThresherKing @xrlq @ASFleischman @James_J_McQuaid Do you really envision a scenario in which someone is unlawfully present in the US but doesn’t want their child to be a citizen?

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@elliottb21 @ErnieYachts @eyesthedon If a defensive player (not strictly the goalkeeper) saves the ball, it doesn’t reset if someone is offside

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@ErnieYachts @eyesthedon Doesn't matter, because he doesn't interfere in the play that he was in an offside position for, and then he's onside when the ball is played to him.

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@EWess92 @jimmy_esq FWIW there’s a bit of recent history with the 9th Circuit doing something similar when there was a lot of media coverage of an incident, see the Judge Benitez (CASD) incident in 2023.

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@Fatcatdiet @GsuGrinding Not anymore, they abolished it at the start of the year

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@_cashcarstar @Anonyossum @Dexerto The problem with this argument is that Pattie Gonia specifically filed for a trademark for apparel.

“Patagonia” (which is a legally incontestable mark for apparel) and “Pattie Gonia” sound the same and would be in the same industry, so it’s textbook trademark infringement.

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@KateSugarBear @jakehalloran1 @No_Toilets @LandoMando02 People speed all the time. Doesn’t mean it’s legal.

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@suednim3 @No_Toilets Certainly not. By definition, SLAPP suits are meritless, this one is quite meritorious.

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@AJ_Specter23 @MikelleStreet @kristoferthomas What’s the commentary? A parody can’t just be a spoof, it has to be a comment on the original work.

Regardless, since we’re in trademark territory and not copyright, it’s likelihood of confusion and dilution that matters. There’s no “fair use” defense.

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@JananRajaratnam @josephnollasj @Aelthemplaer Well, he’s not a Jesuit…

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@AladinKumar1 @johnpelwood The ticket was specifically for traveling 11-15mph over, not for speeding generally.

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@btfitzpat @danepps Panel opinion at 5.

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@btfitzpat @danepps I think this is a case of misguided litigation strategy. The spa solely brought a First Amendment challenge because they previously settled the investigation and only retained the ability to challenge the constitutionality of the statute, not whether they violated it.

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@ckuck @ReichlinMelnick 8 USC 1354(m) doesn't exist...

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@Bored_Anterieur @jimmy_esq Because if she does then the DOJ can go to another justice who will then hand it over.

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@mbkool2 @JakeSherman I mean that’s aligned exactly with what the tweet says

[The Math Man @guynumbers__]

@zeebatron454 @MLS @TimbersFC Mora is very much not Brazilian