#TwitterPeerReview - Twitter Hashtag

over 3 years ago

@rangefront #HomeTown #Famous of course, i had to go double check to see that i spelled it correctly. we put these reports together for the state in under half hour, so the chance for mistakes is huge. #TwitterPeerReview

1

2

0

126

Jason "Jay" R. Patton @patton_cascadia

almost 4 years ago

@geosmx added this to my M7.6 thread here is an article that we put together after a couple of these events that unfolded in real time, learning together as a group https://t.co/Eft6BSUXz4 your comment abt fast and correct is a challenge is not lost by yours truly. #TwitterPeerReview

0

4

2

0

Tyler Black, MD

@tylerblack32

over 4 years ago

Hi @FrontiersIn : A paper of yours (editor: @GetchellNancy) missed some very important (and honestly basic) statistical issues, and is contributing to a narrative that is not supported by the paper. #twitterpeerreview #reviewer2stepsinanddoesthejob #statstwitter

Tyler Black, MD

@tylerblack32

over 4 years ago

The editorial process at @FrontiersIn makes a blunder. A study looking at "Developmental delays in children born during the pandemic" claims that fine motor delay and communication delay were seen comparing 2015-2019 & 2020. This is very misleading. I see this mistake a lot. /1

tylerblack32's tweet photo. The editorial process at @FrontiersIn makes a blunder. A study looking at "Developmental delays in children born during the pandemic" claims that fine motor delay and communication delay were seen comparing 2015-2019 & 2020.

This is very misleading. I see this mistake a lot.

/1 https://t.co/nREOhZwh5K

13

249

84

60

0

3

20

5

1

0

Diana Rodríguez Espinosa @dianarodespi

over 5 years ago

💡Perfecto ejemplo de la maravilla de #medtwitter. 📌Alguien publica resultados de un artículo. 📌Aparecen revisores espontáneos generando una discusión alrededor del tema😍🤓. #TwitterPeerReview #FOAMed

Jonathan Chávez

@JonathanNefro

over 5 years ago

Administrar vasopresores por vía venosa periférica es seguro, los eventos adversos asociados se presentan solo en el 1.8% de los adultos y 3.3% de los niños. No necesitas catéter central. En metaanálisis de 23 estudios #ISNyoung CritCare 2021 https://t.co/1BKft2CAqf

JonathanNefro's tweet photo. Administrar vasopresores por vía venosa periférica es seguro, los eventos adversos asociados se presentan solo en el 1.8% de los adultos y 3.3% de los niños. No necesitas catéter central.
En metaanálisis de 23 estudios

#ISNyoung

CritCare 2021
https://t.co/1BKft2CAqf https://t.co/0wDFKPCUSt

7

418

136

39

0

3

0

Ty Miller Lab

@TyMillerLab

over 5 years ago

This is how #TwitterPeerReview should work, if it becomes a thing. I'm sure this took awhile to do, but an excellent thread, from arguably the world's top computation biologist for mtDNA lineage tracing, reviewing a preprint on mtDNA lineage tracing #OpenScience 👏 @CalebLareau

Caleb Lareau

@CalebLareau

over 5 years ago

I'm genuinely excited to see the extension of methods to discern clonal structure from mtDNA variants-- something that I've thought about over the years. However, I'm going to comment on a couple of points in this pre-print to hopefully show why mtDNA tracing isn't easy 1/n

3

117

20

23

0

2

11

2

0

Andrew Dhawan @andrewdhawan

over 5 years ago

I love the idea of #TwitterPeerReview (shorter, faster, more agile, and perhaps easier to have scientific discourse in some respects)

Jake Scott @CancerConnector

over 5 years ago

An experiment. We recently solicited #TwitterPeerReview for our @medrxivpreprint of a pooled analysis of GARD https://t.co/qaBL4l57X6 we have revised and rewritten based on great critiques and present our rebuttal for consideration to the world. @OncoAlert #radonc THREAD 1/n

2

34

18

6

0

3

2

0

Jake Scott @CancerConnector

over 5 years ago

An experiment. We recently solicited #TwitterPeerReview for our @medrxivpreprint of a pooled analysis of GARD https://t.co/qaBL4l57X6 we have revised and rewritten based on great critiques and present our rebuttal for consideration to the world. @OncoAlert #radonc THREAD 1/n

2

34

18

6

0

Thread Reader App

@threadreaderapp

over 5 years ago

@ReneArathRojasM Hello, you can read it here: ¿La suplementacion de Vitamina D ⬇️riesgo de #COVID19 grave?🧵 #TwitterPeerReview General: ✅Estudio anidado en cohorte… https://t.co/0Bi7AEJiSn Enjoy :) 🤖

0

Petra de Graaf (@[email protected]) @gravinpetra

almost 6 years ago

@rafaelotinoco @DrVeronikaCH I actually had a supervisor with a last name stating with B, didn't help much since his name was prone to spelling mistakes. Did you correct for that? #twitterpeerreview

1

8

0

Carrie Kahler @emynarnon

almost 6 years ago

Science, ya’ll, means paying attention to details #TwitterPeerReview

AltFDA @alt_fda

almost 6 years ago

You’ve probably seen a lot of talk in the last few days about getting the virus from surfaces. #Thread 🧵

2

23

8

2

0

1

0

preprintsifter @preprintsifter

about 6 years ago

Overwhelmed by #COVID19 #preprints? @Preprintsifter makes it simple by gathering critical analysis on latest research from leading epidemiologists, virologists, etc on Twitter. Follow the tool @preprintsifter & learn more https://t.co/IWnKD6ap17 #OpenPeerReview #TwitterPeerReview

1

5

3

0

Hong @hqu

about 6 years ago

Stefanie2000: Ok, so hqu daisywinner and I did a thing. Hope it helps you access the best of #TwitterPeerReview on #COVID19 https://t.co/jHlYBt4pDO

The Journalist's Resource @JournoResource

about 6 years ago

🔍🔍New tool for journalists trying to make sense of the onslaught of #COVID19 preprints: @preprintsifter finds authoritative tweets from leading epidemiologists and other experts who are discussing and vetting #COVID19-related preprint papers on Twitter. https://t.co/apykKpRkxM

1

7

12

1

0

2

0

StefanieFriedhoff @stef_friedhoff

about 6 years ago

Ok, so @hqu @daisywinner and I did a thing. Hope it helps you access the best of #TwitterPeerReview on #COVID19

The Journalist's Resource @JournoResource

about 6 years ago

🔍🔍New tool for journalists trying to make sense of the onslaught of #COVID19 preprints: @preprintsifter finds authoritative tweets from leading epidemiologists and other experts who are discussing and vetting #COVID19-related preprint papers on Twitter. https://t.co/apykKpRkxM

1

7

12

1

0

1

6

2

0

Louise Perkins King @louise_p_king

about 6 years ago

@BortolettoMD I’m loving #twitterpeerreview Clunky hashtag I know but that’s what this is and it’s awesome!

0

2

1

0

OM. @omlazo

about 6 years ago · Islington

@Espelunco O tienes 53% de mujeres + gente que vive sola en tu muestra. 🤷🏻‍♂️ En todo caso ese 53/47 no sostiene tu conclusión, jajaja. #TwitterPeerReview

0

2

0

Bernie Marini @Berninini

almost 7 years ago

@TaylorJ_MD @AaronGoodman33 Yes - typo - thank you! #twitterpeerreview FTW!

0

2

0

Keith Siau

@drkeithsiau

about 7 years ago

Thanks for all your feedback, which was shared and appreciated by everyone who attended. Might do this more often! #TwitterPeerReview

drkeithsiau's tweet photo. Thanks for all your feedback, which was shared and appreciated by everyone who attended. Might do this more often! #TwitterPeerReview https://t.co/A4Wyme51Ac

0

2

0

C. Michael Gibson MD

@CMichaelGibson

over 7 years ago

Ummm ... not so fast @NatureNews ... others are unable to validate this finding in #TwitterPeerReview aka #TPR

nature

@Nature

over 7 years ago

People with two disabled copies of the CCR5 gene are 21% more likely to die before the age of 76 when compared to people with at least one working copy of the gene. https://t.co/V1icVLhwHx

4

94

46

5

0

1

5

4

0

Ben Inskeep @Ben_Inskeep

over 7 years ago

UPDATED: Map showing status of 100% clean/renewable policies in US (assuming NM 100% bill is officially enacted as expected). Thanks to #TwitterPeerReview for the constructive dialogue on this topic. We are making a few changes to address your helpful feedback. Short thread.