@wolfejosh@NYPDPC It's funny, I was wondering just yday if he might have been jawboned by the fed govt or Albany (with funding threats?) to keep her on when he took office. If that approximates the truth, he'll have a hard time firing her. And I sure hope that he can't/won't.
With the impact of AI on the jobs of LIRR's riders, the railroad strikers couldn't pick a more tone deaf moment for this. In the private sector, the dispute would be resolved by letting-go of more "ticket-puncher" positions each day until the union caves.
With the impact of AI on the jobs of LIRR's riders, the railroad strikers couldn't pick a more tone deaf moment for this. In the private sector, the dispute would be resolved by letting-go of more "ticket-puncher" positions each day until the union caves.
Here's a thought.
Until now, #Metaplanet has monetized downside Bitcoin volatility through writing puts, and upside volatility through covered calls.
Why not monetize downside equity volatility through put writing, as an indirect and more accretive way to initiate the buyback program, all while generating income -> further improving the case (and div paying sustainability) for prefs.
If assignment occurs, they retire shares at Accretion Multiple > 1.
Here's why they should — and what it would look like.
1/
The current Metaplanet playbook has worked predominantly on one engine: issue at premium.
That works when mNAV > 1 (not exactly, but let's keep it simple for illustrative purposes).
But this playbook has a missing leg.
2/
An open-market buyback is somewhat reactive, and once the shot is fired, they risk not having much dry powder or capacity to continue if things get worse. Not to mention, it doesn't generate income while waiting.
Writing puts is the more elegant version, and feeds directly into what they are already building:
→ Generate premium income while you wait → set disciplined strikes at sub-NAV levels → implicit floor signaling → continued vol-monetization under all circumstances
3/
Here's an example of how it would work (figures are illustrative only)
The structure:
An OTC private placement of short puts.
Terms:
• Strike: 75-85% of simple NAV per share at trade • Tenor: 6 months • Size: ~3% of float per tranche • Settlement: physical • Trigger: only fires when 20-day VWAP mNAV ≤ 1.05x
Pricing:
MP realized vol has run 80-130% annualized in active windows. A 6-month, 20% OTM put at IV ~100% prices around 12-15% of strike.
On a 3% float tranche: roughly $25-45M in upfront premium. All of it converts to BTC on trade date (~310-560 BTC at current prices).
4/
Now the funding piece.
MP has ~$253M untapped on the BTC-collateralized credit facility.
This is latent capacity, while they remain under-leveraged at ~14% amplification.
Assignment, if it occurs, gets funded from this facility.
5/
Here's what the program accomplishes:
→ Premium income ($25-45M → BTC → Contingent float reduction → BTC-per-share accretion in both legs → Amplification ratio expands (BTC up, share count flat-or-down)
Income in upside. Income in downside.
6/
This also flips the "constant dilution" narrative on its head. In sub-NAV regimes, they are concentrating shares while growing BTC and BTC/share.
The model becomes symmetric. Food for thought.
$MPJPY $MTPLF
@thebtcpharaoh Same conclusion, the best way to prove Japan regulator they can sustain the prefs is to do it elsewhere. Now how will they differentiate themselves from Strive?
So funny that for California governor, the Democratic Socialists of America endorsed billionaire Tom Steyer, whose resume includes Stanford MBA, Morgan Stanley, Goldman, private-equity, and hedge-fund founder whose firm invested in private prisons and coal.
Apparently ~160 people in Austin, TX may make $100M+ from the SpaceX IPO. 12 will clear $1B.
Don't sleep on Austin - that's a lot of capital formation, very quickly.
The confounding factor is that virtually every big company is overstaffed by 2-4x and has been for decades. AI is the catalyst/excuse to finally fix that. Of course nobody wants to say this out loud.
Boomers bought a house on one income.
You can't buy a house on two.
Same country. Same labor. Same hours.
Different money.
Now ask yourself who took it.
Gold used to back the dollar until 1971.
Now they can print as much money as they want.
This event is what caused the end of single-worker households and the collapse of our birthrates.
We need to fix the money to fix civilization.
@johnarnold Appreciate you elevating these kinds of systemic issues into the public discourse. The medical-industrial complex can be scary to stand up to for many Americans. Speaking of, what do you think of what @JoinCrowdHealth is doing?
Hi everyone, the public comment closes on May 7.
I urge you to join this coalition letter urging JPXI to reconsider. The link is provided by BitcoinForCorporations. Thank you!
Tonight I’m hosting The Bitcoin Mining Playbook with @simpleminingio and @Metaplanet
We’ll be covering:
• Japan Bitcoin Future Forum recap
• Bitcoin macro environment
• Why Bitcoin mining matters for investors
• How hosted mining actually works
• Live miner giveaway + Q&A
If you’re interested in Bitcoin, macro, or mining economics, this will be a good one.
See you there