Bovaer is being added to BEEF and MILK because it is thought to prevent climate change.
This is based on woke science.
The truth is, it might harm your health in many ways.
I’ll explain.
Post truth: knowledge as a power game
Any side of political debate on any topic will tend to reproach others of disinformation
Read how it works
[Excellent book, recommended]
I just learned that the Bezos Earth Fund is sponsoring another National Academy of Sciences Committee on climate change, also full of COI and climate advocates
What's going on over there?
Amazing to watch the National Academy of Sciences committee on extreme event attribution discussing in a public session how they can better support climate litigation with a climate litigator
Both the litigator & members of the committee are funded to pursue litigation 🤷♂️
@MikeHudema Science by assertion. They knew nothing about cloud response or any of the other possible rapid response channels of the climate that may ameliorate to zero the small perturbation of human CO₂ emissions.
Nothing of the climate is beyond natural variability.
@afsaalumni@mitfreespeech "Climate policy" is a nonsense, no policy will have any effect on climate. That's delusional.
My book is free, +30,000 downloads, time to bring back science to the forefront and stop gaslighting people with a lunacy and a failed political narrative.
https://t.co/AaCnSF4mCx
Global climate finance is crucial — and making it more available, accessible, and affordable is the key to real progress. Today, the UAE Pavilion has been at the center of these vital discussions.
#COP29Azerbaijan#AcceleratingAction#UAEClimate
The dilemma nicely described in this book [i don't like the subtitle]:
Renewable energies decline in LCOE, but system costs don't decline. Result: cost decline is real, but subsidy levels don't decrease, also becomes difficult to finance projects because of negative prices
Good riddance, this toilet quality (news)paper won't be missed by anyone.
They should learn that their poopaganda and broken narratives, such as the climate non sense, are of no value to critically informed readers.
In 1972 the prestigious Club of Rome projected that growth in consumption would have exceeded the available resources of many minerals, including natural gas and petroleum, by today.
#Catastrophizing
@giulio_mattioli High confidence only for CO2 contribution
CO2 contribution of 1.5% of global anthropogenic
Global anthropogenic is not known to a precision, so it must be less
With non-anthropogenic (oceans, forest fires, volcanoes) it may get to below 1%
Too marginal to have any effect
@giulio_mattioli@GPofficial111@PoyetPatrice You should have been able to answer this without an appeal to IPCC. And trust me IPCC doesn't give an answer to those questions.
Do you know why?