@Marcus211334133@_its_not_real_ all you have to do is buy in an area where its impossible to get a job, so you rely on remote work and then have AI obsolete the demand for your entire profession
simple
>Cme already has the better machinery
you mean in terms of latency or liquidity 'moat' or what? their ability to handle cross-margin efficiency, transparent settlement, product breadth, act quickly, compose etc. will never be as good as hyperliquid
they don't even have perpetuals yet and there is no indication they'd implement them better than hyperliquid? They do not have the same ability to think and execute from first principles either.
Today, Bloomberg reported on certain incumbent traditional exchanges raising concerns about the integrity and impact of markets for perpetual derivatives on Hyperliquid.
These concerns are unfounded.
Hyperliquid offers enhanced market transparency, publishing a complete onchain record of every transaction in real time, making it a uniquely hostile environment for insider trading or price manipulation. Hyperliquid’s transparency serves as a strong deterrent for misconduct and facilitates surveillance, detection, and investigation by regulators and law enforcement.
Hyperliquid also offers 24/7 trading, an innovation that substantially increases market efficiency. Prices move whether traditional exchanges are open or not. Continuous trading eliminates gaps and discontinuities between legacy market hours, improving price discovery for all participants.
Bloomberg correctly reports that U.S. law is not currently tailored for derivatives markets on public blockchains like Hyperliquid. We look forward to continuing our work with policymakers in Washington to bring onchain markets inside the regulatory perimeter.
@choffstein@bennpeifert he blocked me over a relatively minor comment and I assume he engages in similarly deriding and aggressive behaviors on the site
I'm sure you can anticipate the other arguments but this policy allows them to expand their student body and have greater selection power pulling the best admits to the university.
A handful of entrepreneurs that would have otherwise not have started (see Morazzoni 2024, Krishnan & Wang 2019) etc. or would even have otherwise attended a state-school (due to cost) quickly demolish the economic returns on a grad choosing to do IB or consulting grunt work over a science PhD (if that indeed is better for the economy, which I find highly unlikely).
@JimDMiller@yishan@BKJester debt causes suboptimal job matching, loss of opportunity entrepreneurship.
I'd argue its a distortion rather rather than proper incentive for most of the uchicago cohort especially considering postitive externalities from ie research pursuit etc.
Govt funding for research etc is strictly earmarked/accounted. Tax-cuts argument doesn't make sense either, especially if this increases the universities future growth, endowment, spending, student-quality (which it will) especially considering said grads will be paying taxes in their businesses and careers.
I'd have to be a bit more familiar with you outside of this string of tweets to know if giving you 100 mil would be a bad use of taxpayer money, but so-far absolutely ;)
Stop making other alumns like me look bad man.
This has zero impact on the US debt.
Also compare the endowment and donations given to the university by the other non mentally-deficient alumnis to it's government funding.
And account for how UChicago grads use funding and contribute to the US economy, we are a better steward of the capital almost certainly vs. debt interest.
@welkerlaw@excel_rator@markvalorian@BoringBiz_ the models will all still use search. google is not in a different world their foundation model is essentially exactly as powerful they are just behind in code scaffolding because they launched antigravity like a few months ago but they have runway to way more traction than cc