@waldenpod@emuse1955@da_pacem Either you watched the whole debate or you didn't. If you did, your comment is dishonest: the debate was about the book's inspiration, not its content per se and you know that. If you didn't, you're guilty of the same ignorance you mock in others.
@Thomiste_1 I would also recommend Fr. José Hellín, SJ. Probably my favorite suarezian of the XX century. His work on natural theology is the best. Btw, where I can find Ginebra works available?
@sincead33@sincead33 can a catholic deny the real distinction between substance and accident and still defend the dogma of transubstantiation without heresy?
@Thomisticae I find it intriguing that John of St. Thomas does not appeal to the principle that the act can only be limited by potency as proof of the distinction between essence and existence, contrary to more recent thomists.
@DrCalumMiller When they start dying or having health problems from the procedure, they'll ask for legalization so doctors can help the poor victims. Absolutely demonic.
@NMTimMcGrew@goingawoll Is there some materials available on Arif Ahmed (2015) "Hume and the independent witness"? There he argues that even collective experiences of a miracle aren't sufficient.