@EyeOSauron@wil_da_beast630 Not even a single nation is exempt. All of our ancestors committed wrongs. But that is the past, and the people who actually did those things are no longer in this world. We owe no one for that history. We support others out of hope for a better future, not to pay off a debt
@StefanMolyneux Is sexual freedom for sites like OnlyFans truly justifiable ? In terms of freedom of thought, I can't forbid it, but that 10% showing skin on there. Honestly, I find it absurd
@LisaBritton If someone says they're being disrespected, don’t just take it at face value. Look into the facts. If it’s valid, they have a point. If it’s unreasonable, they’re just playing the victim. A lot of people don’t even know what respect is
La mère du féminisme moderne utilisait son autorité de professeur pour séduire ses jeunes élèves et les livrer à Jean-Paul Sartre.
L'Histoire a fait de Simone de Beauvoir l'icône absolue de l'émancipation féminine. La philosophe qui a appris aux femmes à se libérer de la domination des hommes.
Mais derrière la légende se cache un abus de pouvoir moral et sexuel implacable.
Dans les années 1930, Beauvoir enseigne la philosophie. Elle cible notamment Bianca Bienenfeld, une élève âgée de seulement 16 ans. Elle entame une relation intime avec l'adolescente, l'isole psychologiquement, puis l'introduit dans le lit de son compagnon, Jean-Paul Sartre.
La mécanique est destructrice : Beauvoir séduit, Sartre consomme.
Dans leurs correspondances privées publiées à titre posthume en 1990, le cynisme du couple donne la nausée. Les jeunes filles y sont déshumanisées, affublées de pseudonymes comme Louise Védrine pour Bianca.
Beauvoir écrit noir sur blanc la gestion clinique de ses lycéennes. Elle raconte à Sartre les nuits passées avec elles, décrivant la naïveté et la soumission de ses élèves avec la froideur d'un entomologiste.
Dans ses lettres, elle s'amuse ouvertement de l'emprise totale qu'elle exerce. Elle décrit ses proies en larmes, sanglotant de jalousie ou d'angoisse, tout en coordonnant l'emploi du temps avec Sartre pour se les repasser sans que l'une ne croise l'autre.
Sartre lui répond sur le même ton glacial, réclamant des détails intimes ou se plaignant du fardeau émotionnel que ces jeunes filles leur imposent. Le couple mythique gère la vie intime de ses élèves comme un contrat logistique, réduisant ces adolescentes à l'état de jouets jetables.
L'impunité vacille avec le cas de Nathalie Sorokine. En décembre 1941, la mère de la jeune fille dépose une plainte officielle contre Beauvoir pour détournement et corruption de mineure.
L'enquête administrative confirme le comportement manipulateur de la philosophe. En juin 1943, l'Éducation nationale relève Beauvoir de ses fonctions pour conduite incompatible avec le métier d'enseignante.
Ses défenseurs utilisent systématiquement le contexte de l'Occupation pour réduire cette affaire à une simple persécution politique menée par le régime de Vichy. Beauvoir sera d'ailleurs formellement réintégrée à la Libération en juillet 1945, bien qu'elle ne remettra plus jamais les pieds dans un lycée.
Mais le paravent politique de Vichy ne tient pas.
Les preuves les plus accablantes ne viennent pas des archives pétainistes. Elles viennent de l'encre même de Simone de Beauvoir et des mémoires publiés en 1993 par Bianca Bienenfeld, qui décrira cette emprise comme un traumatisme absolu.
Le mythe s'effondre. L'icône du progressisme a consciemment utilisé son prestige intellectuel pour manipuler et détruire de très jeunes femmes au seul profit de son couple.
Cinema, media, and academia have long cultivated a friendly image for the left. They harbor the seeds of socialism, and free speech has allowed them to penetrate far too deep into your society. Rooting them out will require immense public awareness.
I once thought economics could defeat them by showing people how utterly communism and socialism fail to bring prosperity. But now they can point to China as a role model. In truth, they are being deceived. China is the most insidious player of all, constantly lying and showing only what they want the world to see
I’m excited to finally announce the newest edition my Stanford course 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗻 𝗦𝗼𝗳𝘁𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗗𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿. It has been 9 months in the making.
Last November, with the release of Claude Opus 4.5, coding agents experienced a step function improvement in capability. We all felt it. The LLMs were more powerful, could reason for longer, solve harder tasks.
This year’s iteration of my course reflects the 2026 metamorphosis of software engineering.
My core belief is simple: AI-native developers of the LLM era are going to become the most important members of any software organization. I have designed my course to train this next generation of engineers.
𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱
First, 85% of my Fall 2025 class material is being thrown out. The Fall 2026 syllabus reflects the core capabilities AI-native engineers must have: agent skills, advanced context engineering, MCP portals, agent-ready codebase principles, agentic code review, security, parallelizing background agents, software factories, and more.
Second, I am going to teach my students how to have software taste. Every student will be required to ship pull requests to production-grade, real-world codebases. The course is collaborating with the top open-source AI repos who will offer support and mentorship to students on how to meaningfully contribute to their projects.
This has never been done before in any university course so I am incredibly grateful to our OSS Partners: @browserbase, @HeyGen, @CopilotKit, @semgrep, @OpenHandsDev, @milvusio, @marimo_io, Pi, @crewAIInc, @warpdotdev, @vercel, @cmux, @arizeai, @UnslothAI, and @anyscalecompute.
𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲
I’m fortunate to again have AI software engineering leaders and founders as guest speakers to share their learnings from building top coding agent products. Thank you to @leerob from @cursor_ai, @bcherny of @claudeai code, @EnoReyes of @FactoryAI, @silasalberti of @cognition, @0xine of @semgrep, Rajesh Bhatia of @Cloudflare , @amasad of @Replit, and @eladgil.
All resources will be available online. All classes will be available to the public.
9/22 on Stanford campus. See you in class.
https://t.co/wTokHyUMsz
@Magacumlaude71@FoxNews The free world is actually very fragile. Cherish and defend it. Civilization will decline with communism, socialism, and Islamic extremism
How do you destroy socialism ? Banning it only makes things worse, because it is built on a massive delusion of fairness and equality. When you ban them, they accuse you of stripping away equality, justice, and freedom, paint you as a tyrant, and rally the gullible masses behind them. May God be with you
Well, America already abolished slavery. Do you want America to be indebted to you just because it once practiced slavery ? By that logic, the whole world should owe each other, because slavery was once widespread and no race was exempt. People of color owned slaves too, so does that make them any better?
@jemelehill You don't know a thing. You're just like those communists in developing countries, basing your arguments on hate and emotion without a shred of evidence. You enjoy the prosperity America provides, only to take shots at the very country that feeds you. A true emblem of opportunism
@jemelehill This is wrong. Slavery had no effect on America becoming a "world economic power". It was the Industrial Revolution that vaulted the US into an economic power.
Look at this chart. The red line is where slavery ended.
Since taking office, @JMilei has brought monthly inflation down from nearly 20% to roughly 2%.
Halved poverty in Argentina.
Reduced government spending by laying off 56,000 civil servants.
Rent prices down 40%.
It can be done.
If the love for your nation and people is your priority.