@LoamAndLight@DavidDeutschOxf@joebosphilos Leaders who win elections should get their policies enacted, but should also be restrained in some real way or else knowledge would more likely be lost than gained. And that likelihood should be limited.
"The appearance of federal law enforcement agents on the doorstep of news reporters should shock the conscience of any American who believes in the Constitution and the press freedom it protects." https://t.co/1RuXDDN3I9
@MDSebach Hate to break it to you but republicans now allow the government to buy shares in multiple companies, pressure other companies on their prices and policies, personally advertise companies Trump invests in and to arbitrarily enact and remove tariffs. But yes, more about socialism.
@MoZarrinsadaf Current AI is not creative, meaning it can’t generate new knowledge (like human minds). Therefore it is most unlike a human mind. But if true AGI were to be developed, we would have to treat them as equivalent to people. Shouldn’t be anything to hate either way.
@Briankeating Close but not correct. Math proofs aren’t really *proving* anything in a completely final way. Nothing can be proved with certainty, not even that the earth is not flat. This is because we are all fallible.
@PaulRRobichaud Our actions are *mostly* driven by actual ideas, sometimes by more primitive needs in which we intentionally fabricate false ideas as a justification.
The political system envisioned by the US founders would have prevented much of the damage currently being done to American interests by Trump. Which is sometimes better than prioritizing the expediency of political change.