@baseballot Cook Political kept CA-22 at tossup up until the very end despite Dems winning the primary by 18 points. They kept all the NC house seats at safe weeks after the EV suggested they’d be competitive. They did not follow the data, and now look stupid as a result.
@PokiJaciii it’s based off of 100k or so, idk how the 30k extra changed it but probably not enough. If dems were ahead I think they might’ve had a shot but when they’re trailing they need late ballots to be significantly bluer and I’m not seeing that
@SemioticRivalry I suck at interpreting early vote and have gotten misled by it many times, so now I’m going to throw a temper tantrum and act like it is impossible for anyone to interpret it accurately, as the sole arbiter of whether it is legally allowable to interpret early vote
@Nate_Cohn@rudnicknoah Are you able to publish your estimates for how Harris/Trump performed with voters who voted in 2022/24? Would be useful to gauge how much was differential turnout vs persuasion, because I think the biggest cause of the polling miss was modeling the wrong LV electorate
@aggou Something I find particularly instructive is looking at the two way reg of 2026 primary voters who have showed up so far, and two way reg of those who did vote vote in the primary
@AlbenbarkleyFan@gelliottmorris@50plus1news One red flag is that with so many responses, surely at least someone notices them doing a poll and posts about it on social media. For instance, you often see leaks about potential NYT polls bc they do real polls. I have yet to see someone claim they were contacted by trafalar
@AlbenbarkleyFan@gelliottmorris@50plus1news I think their other polls were fake too, they just did so many, each with roughly the same response rate from their 75000 sample size, with no actual methodology or crosstabs posted. Just because the topline seems plausible doesn’t mean the poll is real