amz @arpxspace - Twitter Profile

@paulg Thought about this as well but wouldn’t this require AI to become more sentient? Currently sales is just a game of persuasion with human emotions.

0

13

amz

@arpxspace

9 days ago

@icecolddietcoke @cavemanloverboy @jimstewartson Exactly that

0

45

amz

@arpxspace

12 days ago

here's the repo: https://t.co/7ricDWDNzg

0

25

amz

@arpxspace

12 days ago

in addition to the suggestions listed, i've built a claude code mod that works like kindle's 'word wise' any esoteric term claude throws at you now comes with a definition that you can hover over. no more breaking your flow to figure out what something means. especially useful when exploring unfamiliar concepts and ideas.

Andrej Karpathy

@karpathy

21 days ago

We'll be spending a lot more time trying to understand the outputs of language models. A few thoughts, tips & tricks: Writing. Something I've had success with: Ask your LLM to explain something in ASD-STE100, it's a controlled language specification originally developed for aerospace maintenance documentation. LLMs well-versed in this language and it comes with heavy constraints on clean writing style that I often find a lot more readable. Sometimes I've tried to soften it a bit e.g. ask for "80% of the way to ASD-STE100" because the spec is quite stringent. But even better: Diagrams / images. Instead of writing, ask your LLM to create a diagram. These can be a lot easier to process, parse, and understand. But even better: Web pages. Ask for output "in HTML" to get a beautiful, interactive webpage. LLMs are getting really good at frontend and can create beautiful experiences, animations, etc. But even better: Explainer videos. The output format I am most bullish on is fully custom / bespoke explainer videos generated on any arbitrary topic. Experiment with things like "Create a 3b1b style video explainer on X. Use my ElevenLabs API key for audio narration". (you'd need an API key for the latter or you can ask your LLM to find you decent free alternatives that use your local compute). This is actually starting to work! In summary: - As LLMs get better, they will do more and more of the legwork autonomously, and a lot more of our work will rise up the abstractions into oversight and understanding. - Luckily, LLMs can help here too because as intelligence and code are increasingly abundant, you can ask for large, custom, discardable software artifacts (e.g. web apps, video explainers) that would have never made sense to create before. Push the boundaries here and you'll be surprised.

karpathy's tweet photo. We'll be spending a lot more time trying to understand the outputs of language models. A few thoughts, tips & tricks:

Writing. Something I've had success with: Ask your LLM to explain something in ASD-STE100, it's a controlled language specification originally developed for aerospace maintenance documentation. LLMs well-versed in this language and it comes with heavy constraints on clean writing style that I often find a lot more readable. Sometimes I've tried to soften it a bit e.g. ask for "80% of the way to ASD-STE100" because the spec is quite stringent. But even better:

Diagrams / images. Instead of writing, ask your LLM to create a diagram. These can be a lot easier to process, parse, and understand. But even better:

Web pages. Ask for output "in HTML" to get a beautiful, interactive webpage. LLMs are getting really good at frontend and can create beautiful experiences, animations, etc. But even better:

Explainer videos. The output format I am most bullish on is fully custom / bespoke explainer videos generated on any arbitrary topic. Experiment with things like "Create a 3b1b style video explainer on X. Use my ElevenLabs API key for audio narration". (you'd need an API key for the latter or you can ask your LLM to find you decent free alternatives that use your local compute). This is actually starting to work!

In summary:
- As LLMs get better, they will do more and more of the legwork autonomously, and a lot more of our work will rise up the abstractions into oversight and understanding.
- Luckily, LLMs can help here too because as intelligence and code are increasingly abundant, you can ask for large, custom, discardable software artifacts (e.g. web apps, video explainers) that would have never made sense to create before. Push the boundaries here and you'll be surprised.

2K

56K

7K

82K

8M

1

2

0

69

amz

@arpxspace

20 days ago

@arscontexta These are really good, thanks for sharing

1

0

152

arpxspace retweeted

Tikhon Jelvis @tikhonjelvis

25 days ago

@JulesJacobs5 @yminsky @dhh This is already how it "feels" to work with good Haskell and OCaml modules: the type definitions and function signatures give me an overview, while the documentation comments teach me what else I need to know. The module structure and types structure the learning materials.

1

14

2

1K