@PeterDClack Not too sure what dataset you are using, but I would guess it is the TTS (tropopause interface). A better data set to look at surface temperatures would be the TLT (lower troposphere).
@Worsel66 @HmGinYYC @balls95652097@ChrisMartzWX@NASA@NOAA@WMO This is the response I would expect from someone funded by oil and gas!!
Oh, you say I offered that comment without a shred of supporting evidence? Humm, without evidence it's easy to say anything isn't it?
Wow.
This video is truly eye-opening.
Take a couple minutes to watch this.
A mind-boggling visual representation of wealth inequality in America.
This sh*t ain’t workin’, folks. #TaxBillionaires#UnionsForAll
@JafSupO@ProfMarkMaslin@Global_Witness@elonmusk@Twitter @GeraldKutney I don't think is a far cry. The paper went on to draw the conclusion that it was the pressure on earth that caused the current warming - not CO2.
This paper claims to show a reverse relation between CO2 and temperature, i.e. that an increase in temperature causes a rise in CO2
@JafSupO@ProfMarkMaslin@Global_Witness@elonmusk@Twitter @GeraldKutney If someone could actually disprove the physics that underlies global warming they would have the professorship of their choice and a Nobel Prize. The problem is that people repeat the same arguments that have been disproved. For example, we contribute only a small amount of CO2
@GWrightstone@JunkScience@EcoSenseNow @VijayJayaraj_CC @gwtomb Had a spare minute over lunch so I took the above plot and scaled the CO2 line so it was more comparable to the temperature and I got the following. Is it more accurate - no, just another way to look at the data.
@BarryESharp I don't know about you, but I am concerned with people trusting AI.
For example your quote from ChatGPT says total anthropogenic contribution of CO2 is 552 million metric tons. According to this, that is just Canada's contribution. You might want to check GPT's assumptions.